Investors take credit in Say on Pay reform

Investor action through letters and company dialogue has resulted in more than 40 companies in the US, including Goldman Sachs, State Street, BNY Mellon and Conoco, agreeing to implement Say on Pay reform, according to Timothy Smith, senior vice president, Walden Asset Management who recently coordinated a letter signed by investors including CalPERS chief investment officer Joe Dear, urging 17 financial institutions, including Bank of America, to adopt reform.

“We believe it is critically important for investors to engage companies on say on pay via letters, dialogue and shareholder resolutions. The average vote on these resolutions in this last year’s proxy season was close to 46 per cent, with more than 25 votes over 50 per cent, which sent a very strong message to management,” he said.

CalPERS was among 30 investors that signed the open letter to 17 financial institutions asking them to follow other financial services industry companies to enact the shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation, or Say on Pay.

“We applaud Goldman Sachs, State Street and Bank of New York Mellon for leading the way to enact this important corporate governance reform,” Joe Dear said in a statement. “While CalPERS doesn’t see a shareowner advisory vote as a panacea, companies that adopt the policy will significantly advance sound governance goals of improved accountability to investors and the creation of long-term share value.”

Smith said investors were at the forefront of the reform movement, and while there was still hope that legislation would provide guidance for all companies, it is unclear where the Senate vote is headed.

Sponsored Content

The letter went to 17 companies including Bank of America, JP Morgan Chase, Northern Trust, Morgan Stanley, Citigroup, Wells Fargo, US Bancorp, Waddell & Reed, BB&T, Capital One Financial, American Express, PNC Financial Services, SunTrust, Fifth Third, Comerica, KeyCorp and Regions Financial.

Other signatories include representatives of the California State Teachers’ Retirement System; United Methodist Church General Board of Pension and Health Benefits; Firefighters’ Pension Systems of Kansas City, Mo.; TIAA-CREF; and the Council of Institutional Investors.

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous