ING the latest to hive off funds management

Another big bank is set to hive off its funds management business to shore up its balance sheet, with this week’s announcement of the proposed divestments by ING Group.

The Dutch-based global firm announced it would either float or sell both its funds management and insurance arms within the next four years to help accelerate repayment of facilities granted to it by the Dutch Government in the middle of the financial crisis last year.

ING Investment Management is ranked 15th in the world for funds under management, as at December last year, according to an annual survey by Watson Wyatt Worldwide and Pensions and Investments magazine, with $777 billion. It has about 3,500 staff operating in 34 countries.

The proposed ING sale follows the sale by Barclays Bank of its funds management subsidiary, Barclays Global Investors, to BlackRock, which becomes the world’s largest funds manager, with $2.8 trillion, when that deal is finalised on December 1.

There were already moves afoot, however, for big broking firms to de-couple their funds management arms prior to the financial crisis because of regulatory concerns over cross-selling and the provision of advice, especially in the US.

The acquisitive BlackRock merged with the former Merrill Lynch Investment Management in 2007 and Credit Suisse Investment Management with Aberdeen Asset Management this year.

Sponsored Content

With ING, the EU was concerned it was paying too little for its state guarantee. The company will now repay half of the 10 billion euro (about $17 billion) from the Dutch government in December after it completes a 7.5 billion euro rights issue.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous