Harvard endowment hones managers

Harvard Management Company will increase manager concentration levels, look closely at commodities and real estate, and bring more assets in-house where appropriate, as it moves into fiscal year 2011 with an unchanged long-term asset allocation.President and chief executive of the Harvard Management Company, Jane Mendillo, said risk allocations have been increased in areas where HMC had good long-term experience and competitive strength.

“Internal fixed-income trading and natural resources for example, we have been increasing risk allocations and encouraging our teams to do more when they see good opportunities. We are increasingly confident that we can develop an edge in real estate and commodities, taking a few pages from the books we’ve developed around timberland investing and internal trading,” she said.

In the September endowment report, she also said, HMC intends to continue to reduce uncalled capital commitments to real estate and private equity fund managers, with uncalled capital commitments at the end of fiscal year 2010 sitting at about $6.5 billion, down from over $11 billion two years ago.

Over a 20-year period, private equity has been the best performing asset class for HMC, with a return of 19 per cent, compared with the benchmark of 14 per cent.

While Mendillo said Harvard has benefited from early participation in the private equity arena, it had become crowded – with capital, managers and investors – in the past decade.

“Our expectations for this asset class are that returns will be more muted going forward, and we are even more committed to holding our fire for the best-in-class opportunities,” she said.

Sponsored Content

While Harvard will continue to have a “meaningful level of exposure”, it is anticipated the number of active relationships within private equity and venture capital portfolio will be reduced, and the concentration will be increased in the highest conviction managers.

Across the entire portfolio Harvard has been increasing its concentration levels with the number of relationships decreasing by about 20 per cent in the past couple of years.

“We focus on partnering with the best of the best and improving the terms under which we operate together, moving toward greater access to our capital and more reasonable fees,” she said.

Investment management of the $27.4 billion endowment is overseen by Stephen Blythe, head of internal management, and Andy Wilthsire, head of external management.

Mendillo said they have collaborated on several joint investigations this year, including an improved active commodities strategy, to be implemented in fiscal 2011.

Mendillo and the university have continue to defend the “endowment model” but have been working to enhance it, through further risk and liquidity management analysis, and a closer working relationship which aims to better align the endowment’s risk/return profile with the university’s goals and needs.

In the last fiscal year 2010, the HMC also engaged a consulting firm to assess its cost structure in managing the endowment, comparing it to a group of asset managers to identify areas of best practice and opportunities for improvement.

The study concluded that over the past five years, HMC’s total operating costs as a percentage of assets under management have averaged less than 0.3 per cent, including variable compensation.

“The study assessed that the HMC’s operating cost structure as significantly less than the cost of equivalent external or outsourced management.”

Mendillo says this has saved Harvard more than $1 billion in management fees over the past decade.

To the year ended June 30, the endowment portfolio earned an investment return of 11 per cent, 160 basis points above the policy portfolio benchmark.

Harvard endowment long-term policy portfolio

1995 2005 2010*
domestic equities 38% 15% 11%
foreign equities 15 10 11
emerging markets 5 5 11
private equities 12 13 13
Total equity 70 43 46
absolute return 0 12 16
commodities 6 13 14
real estate 7 10 9
total real assets 13 23 23
domestic bonds 15 11 4
foreign bonds 5 5 2
high yield 2 5 2
inflation-indexed bonds 0 6 5
total fixed income 22 27 13
cash -5 -5 2
total 100 100 100

*unchanged for fiscal 2011

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Academics and industry unite

The gargantuan impact of systemic risk in global financial markets has been corroborated by a consortium of industry and academics collaborating to provide independent quantitative research, insight and leadership on systemic risk. Driven by director of MIT’s Laboratory for Financial Engineering,  Andrew Lo, senior managing director at State Street Global Markets, Jessica Donohue, and managing

Rethink remuneration

Institutional investors around the world have been lobbying for the right to have a say on pay, a right to have an input into the remuneration of the executives in the companies they invest in. In June the UK’s business secretary, Vince Cable, laid out new plans that will give shareholders three-yearly votes on executive

Endowments fall
from grace

US college and university endowments have gone from pioneers in the adoption of socially responsible investing (SRI) to markedly trailing the rest of the investment industry in integrating environmental social and corporate governance (ESG), new research reveals. The Boston-based Tellus Institute, an independent not-for-profit think-tank, looked at 464 endowments and was damning in its findings,

Kay Review recommendations tackle short-termism

Co-head of responsible investment at the £32 billion Universities Superannuation Scheme, David Russell, says asset manager engagement with companies should move away from its “almost myopic focus on remuneration” to other issues that impact value and strategy. His comments come on the back of the final report of the Kay Review of the UK equity

POLL: Which strategy within emerging markets debt do you find the most compelling?

mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalPERS: “opaquely transparent”

A Columbia Business School case study on CalPERS has criticised the fund for being “opaquely transparent”, with a computation of investment expenses revealing the fund pays three-to-four times its peers in fees. Written by Columbia professor of business Andrew Ang and Columbia CaseWorks fellow, Jeremy Abrams, Californian dreamin’: The mess at CalPERS examines the political,

Previous