European pension funds have blinkered view of risk

The liability-hedging portfolio of European pension funds is imprecisely modelled at nearly half of the pension funds as measured in a EDHEC-Risk Institute survey.The survey, which covered 129 asset/liability management specialists, from pension funds, their advisers, regulators and funds managers, found the majority of respondents have a blinkered view of their risks.

Accounting risk, the volatility from the pension fund in the sponsor’s books, is managed by only 33 per cent of respondents, and more than 50 per cent ignore sponsor risk, or the risk of a bankrupt sponsor leaving a pension fund with deficits.

The author of the report, Samuel Sender, who is applied research manager at EDHEC-Risk Institute, said the first challenge for a pension fund involves meeting its liability by fully or partially hedging it away.

He said the second challenge for pension funds is to gain access to performance through optimal diversification within and between asset classes.

“Most respondents use market indices to define the investment benchmarks of investment funds, even though market indices are weighted by capitalisation and are known to be highly inefficient.

“Additionally even though they are the longest-term investors and are not subject to liquidity risk, pension funds invest relatively little in potentially illiquid assets and therefore do not benefit from the related risk premium.”

Sponsored Content

The last challenge for pension funds, he said, was to respect their minimum funding ratios by insuring risks away.

To manage the prudential constraints, 28 per cent of respondents use risk-controlled investing strategies, and 56 per cent use economic/regulatory capital.

“Like RCI economic capital relies on the measure of risk budget and of a surplus. Economic capital, however involves a discretionary, rather than a rule-based, investment strategy and possible delays.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous