Dutch shake up pension system

The Dutch Government, some unions and employers have agreed on a deal to radically reform the Dutch pension system, with the formerly defined-benefit scheme edging towards a more hybrid defined-contribution arrangement.

Employees must now share some of the risk, with corporate pensions no longer guaranteed against market downturns.

Market downturns will be spread over a 10-year period, with companies and employees able to set risk/return levels for their respective funds.

The winding up of the centrally-controlled system will provide major challenges for funds both in terms of deciding investment strategy, handling the liability side of their balance sheets but also communicating with members.

Premiums will also be split between workers (one-third) and employers (two-thirds) and employers will no longer have to bear the risk of a downturn and have to top-up funding levels.

It is hoped these changes will avoid the so-called “crunch” that underfunded Dutch pension funds found themselves in 2008 and 2009.

Sponsored Content

The Dutch Government also announced that the state pension age would go up from 65 to 66 by 2020 and flagged a further increase to 67 by 2025.

State pensions would also rise 0.6 per cent plus inflation per year from 2013 to 2028.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured) described the deal as the biggest shake up of the Dutch pension system since World War II and said it was a deal involving hundreds of millions of euros.

Major general workers’ union FNV Bondgenoten has recommended its 1.4 million members reject the deal, saying it does not provide enough assurances on payouts.

The deal must still be passed by the Dutch Parliament and will be also need to be approved by a number of unions.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous