Dutch shake up pension system

The Dutch Government, some unions and employers have agreed on a deal to radically reform the Dutch pension system, with the formerly defined-benefit scheme edging towards a more hybrid defined-contribution arrangement.

Employees must now share some of the risk, with corporate pensions no longer guaranteed against market downturns.

Market downturns will be spread over a 10-year period, with companies and employees able to set risk/return levels for their respective funds.

The winding up of the centrally-controlled system will provide major challenges for funds both in terms of deciding investment strategy, handling the liability side of their balance sheets but also communicating with members.

Premiums will also be split between workers (one-third) and employers (two-thirds) and employers will no longer have to bear the risk of a downturn and have to top-up funding levels.

It is hoped these changes will avoid the so-called “crunch” that underfunded Dutch pension funds found themselves in 2008 and 2009.

Sponsored Content

The Dutch Government also announced that the state pension age would go up from 65 to 66 by 2020 and flagged a further increase to 67 by 2025.

State pensions would also rise 0.6 per cent plus inflation per year from 2013 to 2028.

Dutch Prime Minister Mark Rutte (pictured) described the deal as the biggest shake up of the Dutch pension system since World War II and said it was a deal involving hundreds of millions of euros.

Major general workers’ union FNV Bondgenoten has recommended its 1.4 million members reject the deal, saying it does not provide enough assurances on payouts.

The deal must still be passed by the Dutch Parliament and will be also need to be approved by a number of unions.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous