Corporate US plans expect too much

US corporate defined-benefit plans are still severely underfunded, with an artificially high return expectation contributing to the situation, according to a report of the funding status of 308 US corporate defined benefit plans by Wilshire Consulting.

While the funding status of the funds has increased in the past year, from 80.2 to 83.4 per cent, more than 90 of the corporate pension plans remain underfunded.

The slight improvement was due to a vast improvement in pension fund performance, with the median 2009 investment return of 16.2 per cent representing a stark rebound from the -27.4 per cent median return of 2008.

The survey measured the funding status, and investment profile, of 308 companies in the S&P500 index that maintain defined benefit plans. In the year the combined assets increased from $883 billion to $992.9 billion, while the liabilities increased from $1,101.5 billion to $1,191.2 billion.

Although the median expected return on plan assets’ assumptions has fallen during the past nine years, from 9.5 per cent in 2000 to 8 per cent in 2009, the report quotes that many pension accounting critics believe this assumption is still too high.

Sponsored Content

Wilshire Consulting’s long-term forecast for the return on corporate pension plans is will below this, at about 6.4 per cent, based on the average asset allocation of the corporate pension plans.

The average asset allocation of these plans was: 54.1 per cent in total equities; 34 per cent in total fixed income; 1.7 per cent in real estate; 1.4 per cent in private equity; 0.8 per cent in hedge funds; and 8 per cent in other including cash.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous