Commodities and emerging markets funds will run the gauntlet

There are eight “gauntlets” that any managed fund will have to run over the medium term,  according to Investec Asset Management investment strategist Michael Power, and while a Japanese equity fund might be lucky to meet one of them, funds investing in commodities or the emerging markets would satisfy almost all eight.

One key “gauntlet” was a fund’s ability to “surf the carry trade out of the West and into the rest”, Power said.

The fund should also “avoid dollar blindness”, Power said, by not achieving a majority of its returns in the form of US dollars, which the strategist said was declining and fading as the world’s reserve currency.

On a similar tack, Power said investors should choose funds which “achieved a real rate of risk-adjusted return”, and thanks to quantitative easing, this no longer meant a comparison with US 10-year Treasury bonds.

“By printing money, Ben Bernanke has eroded the price of risk. The real risk-free rate is higher than the 2.5 per cent you are getting on 10-year Treasuries,” Power said, citing something like the 6 per cent cost of 10-year capital in Australia as a more appropriate hurdle for investors to consider.

Another “gauntlet” the fund should be able to run was the rise of the supranationals, Power said, pointing out the return of companies like Google, Vodafone or McDonald’s had mostly been superior to their home equity markets.

Sponsored Content

He said the new supranationals were coming from the emerging markets, pointing to the rise of Indian pharmaceutical giants-in-waiting, and the imminent initial public offering of Brazilian energy company Petrobras, which at $76 billion will be the world’s largest ever float (eclipsing another emerging markets float, Agricultural Bank of China, which added $21 billion to the capitalisation of the Shanghai bourse earlier this year).

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous