Carbon credit market gets a boost

Norway and Britain have both announced plans to buy carbon credits, giving the United Nation’s struggling Clean Development Mechanism a boost.

 

Sovereign institutions have thrown a lifeline to the United Nation’s struggling Clean Development Mechanism, CDM, set up under the Kyoto Protocol which awards tradable carbon credits to projects like wind farms or solar power that reduce emissions.

Norway’s Ministry of Finance has just invited submissions under its plans to purchase carbon credits from struggling green energy projects threatened by low prices for the offset they generate. In another development Britain says it plans to buy £50 million worth of carbon credits.

Norway plans to purchase UN Certified Emission Reductions, CERs, up until 2020 spanning the second commitment period of the Kyoto Protocol.

Initial purchases of up to 30 million CERs will be made via specialist fund the Norwegian Carbon Procurement Facility, NorCap, set up in October by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance and the Nordic Environment Finance Corporation, NEFCO, an IFI owned by the five Nordic countries that specialises in financing environmental projects.

Sponsored Content

“We have asked for authorisation from Parliament to spend up to 2 billion Norwegian Krone up until 2020. The 2014 budget appropriation, which is yet to be confirmed by Parliament, is about 316 million Norwegian Krone,” says Sigurd Klakeg, Deputy Director General at the Ministry of Finance.

“Buying these credits is not an investment by the Ministry of Finance. It is for compliance purposes,” says Tommi Tynjala, a senior advisor in carbon finance and funds at Nefco which has assets under management of EUR 230 million.

“It is about helping Norway comply with its Kyoto requirements and helping the carbon market by purchasing from vulnerable projects.”

The carbon market has floundered on oversupply of allowances and reduced emissions eight years on from the first credit being issued. Prices for credits have crashed to less than 50 cents from over 20 euros five years ago.

Under the agreement rich country governments buy the credits to count towards their emissions-cutting targets. Companies can also buy credits to offset the effect of their activities on the climate.

But government institutions are very rarely involved in buying and selling carbon credits. Instead they use the credits to cancel out emissions back home. The financial return comes in that it is often cheaper to buy carbon credits from international projects than reduce domestic emissions.

Klakeg says that Norway’s strategy differs from other institutions weighing in to support the market in that it specifically targets the most vulnerable projects. Those that are either at a standstill or “stranded,” and projects which have no other source of revenue but from carbon prices, he says.

Although 30 billion tonnes “is quite a small amount if you compare it to the total oversupply” and “won’t have any impact on carbon prices” Norway’s purchase is very important for the projects selected, argues Tynjala.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Accenture puts diversity into action

Anna Darnley, 24, recently joined the board of Accenture's UK pension scheme. She and chair Peter George discuss achieving age and gender balance, and what her perspective brings.

Canadian pensions form research hub

Canada’s biggest funds are among the founders of the National Pension Hub, which aims to sponsor research that can help the industry, and has a plan for getting the right academics onto the job.

NBIM takes aim at forex practices

The manager of the $1 trillion Government Pension Fund Global has adopted the FX Global Code of Conduct and expects its counterparties to do the same. But the pension giant hasn’t stopped there.

Call for higher pension ages

The ratio of working years to retirement years should be at least 2 to 1 and raising the pension age is a universal fix for strained systems, the author of Mercer’s Global Pension Index says.

Active strategies still valued

Prominent CIOs say active management’s place is secure, even as passive strategies surge in popularity. But the two types of strategies aren’t as distinct as in years past.

Largest pension funds get bigger

Willis Towers Watson’s report on the top 300 pension funds for 2016 shows the world’s largest 20 funds have increased their share of global pension assets under management by 7.1 per cent.

Previous