CalPERS hires Mercer for compensation review

The $200 billion California Public Employees’ Retirement System (CalPERS) has hired Mercer Consulting review the investment office incentive compensation program, a design set up in 1997 under the guidance of the board’s compensation consultant Watson Wyatt.

The appointment of Mercer, designed to give a new perspective, follows a directive to staff in May to review the existing incentive compensation program and propose modifications to simplify it.

The redesign project will include reviewing CalPER’s current compensation plan as well as analyzing incentive compensation practices in relevant sectors such as other pension funds, endowments, and asset management firms. Mercer will then design a new incentive program and discuss it with the key stakeholders at CalPERS, including the head of the human resources chief Chris O’Brien.

Mercer has begun the process of individual interviews and has interviewed the CIO, senior investment officers, human resources and policy business support divisions. It recommends it has access to select board members and relevant senior management, with the estimated completion date the end of March 2010.

In assessing compensation programs against the market Mercer will review the size and complexity of the operations, assets under management, internally versus externally managed funds; the individual scope and responsibility of each position, and the relative market competition.

Sponsored Content

Mercer highlighted some of the challenges that CalPERS, and other organizations face, including:

Attracting high visibility and scrutiny as a large, public entity;

Fielding questions about the relative performance design component common to investment office incentive plans, such as how can the plan pay out incentives when the fund value is down;

Attracting and retaining high calibre investment professionals to the non-Wall Street investment community;

Providing creative alternatives for compensation investment professionals that are fair, competitive and reasonable; and Simplifying investment compensation strategies to promote transparency.

Nanci Hibschman, principal in the human capital business of Mercer’s San Fransisco office, is the lead compensation consultant, and Louis Finney, principal in Mercer Investment Consulting’s Chicago office is the lead investment consultant.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous