CalPERS, CalSTRS champion for diversity

The Californian pension funds, CalPERS and CalSTRS, have taken a leadership role in promoting corporate board diversity, demonstrated in the launch at the NYSE this week of 3D with GMI Ratings, and membership in the Thirty Percent Coalition.

3D, which stands for Diverse Director DataSource, is a databank of pre-approved board candidates with an emphasis on highlighting people with fresh ideas and new perspectives.

The initiative is consistent with the funds’ focus on long-term shareowner value.

Anne Sheehan, director of corporate governance at the $150-billion CalSTRS, says 3D is a market solution to a supply-and-demand problem.

“As promoters of long-term shareowner value, we’ve been demanding greater diversity on the corporate boards of our portfolio companies for some time. Now we’re prepared to provide a tool to supply corporate-search firms and nominating committees with a deep breadth of quality board candidates. These professionals can not only do the job, but approach issues from diverse perspectives forged by a wide variety of backgrounds and experience, as well as by gender or ethnicity.”

Anne Simpson, CalPERS senior portfolio manager and director of global governance, says 3D is an innovative resource that opens the door to finding candidates whose fresh ideas and new perspectives can help companies generate lasting value and provide a check against the kind of ‘group think’ that played a significant role in the financial crisis.

Sponsored Content

Chair of GMI Ratings, Richard Bennett, says corporate boards work best when they reflect a diversity of perspective and experience.

“With 3D, we created an accessible resource to help companies and recruiting firms identify and recruit candidates sometimes overlooked under traditional search processes. We encourage candidates to continue submitting their credentials for review.”

GMI Ratings is an independent provider of global corporate-governance ratings and research.

It makes business sense to embrace more women

Separately the funds, as part of the Thirty Percent Coalition, sent a letter urging change to the 41 S&P500 companies that do not have any women on their boards.

The Thirty Percent Coalition is a group of pension funds, state officials, fund managers and women’s groups that is pressing for gender diversity on corporate boards.

According to reports by Catalyst, ION and Governance Metrics International, women only hold between 12 and 16 per cent of corporate board seats.

Studies have shown there is a correlation between greater gender diversity among corporate boards and management, good corporate governance and long-term financial performance.

The Thirty Percent Coalition project leader, Charlotte Laurent-Ottomane, says substantial research underscores the correlation between gender diversity, good governance and positive long-term corporate performance.

“We are urging the business community to embrace this elemental truth.”

The letter references quotas being adopted in numerous countries around the world to increase the number of women on corporate boards but proposes instead that companies in the US voluntarily embrace more ambitious diversity goals because it makes business sense.

The group has set a three-year time line by which it would like to see 30 per cent of corporate board seats held by women.

CalSTRS’ Sheehan says the group intends to follow up and engage with each of the 41 companies, asking them to “welcome women to their boards”.

“Whether it’s in dialogue with management, through shareholder resolutions or related strategies, we intend to press for change. And then we’ll move beyond the S&P500 to other companies as well. Our goal is to continue engaging companies until women hold at least 30 per cent of corporate board seats across the United States.”

Of nine board members at CalSTRS, women hold three positions, including the chair, Dana Dillon.

At CalPERS there are only two women on the board.

 

One response to “CalPERS, CalSTRS champion for diversity”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Listed companies are failing on sustainability

US companies are failing to meet a 10-year roadmap to sustainability and some sectors globally are ‘inherently unsustainable’ requiring a drastic refocus, according to two separate reports released this week by leading sustainability research firms Ceres and EIRIS. A report on the progress that some of the world’s biggest companies are making towards achieving sustainability

OECD, ITUC call for more green investment

Amid calls from global leaders for pension funds to invest more in the green economy, institutional green investments still languish at less than 1 per cent of portfolios. A recent OECD report looks at some of the barriers facing investors wanting to invest more in the sector, with regulatory uncertainty and a lack of suitable

Money for water

The global scarcity of water continues to make headlines, but a water-themed investment approach is only just starting to make waves with large institutional investors. Estimates of the assets in equity funds in this niche corner of the investment world vary from about $3 billion to $6 billion in funds under management – a veritable

GMO’s Grantham bets against irrational markets

Supposedly long-term investors typically have the patience to wait about three years to see if an investment strategy will pay-off with managers needing to manage to their own and their client’s career risk tolerance, investment icon and Grantham, Mayo and van Otterloo (GMO) founder Jeremy Grantham says. In his quarterly letter to investors, Grantham says

Mercer: think laterally on bonds

The angst in Europe has calmed down, relatively speaking, but according to Mercer, it will be a long haul, with deleveraging there and in the US taking many years. Investors need to act accordingly. Part of the problem is that conventionally safe assets, such as US Treasuries, are expensive. “That will take years to work

CEM study reveals in-house savings

A defining characteristic of leading pension funds globally is the cost savings garnered from in-house investment management. An organisational design study by CEM Benchmarking has revealed that “leading” funds have an average of 49 per cent of assets managed in-house, and yet the internal staff and non-manager third-party costs make up only 15 per cent

Previous