…as executives take pay-cut

The board of the Canada Pension Plan Investment Board will not award the individual component of executive’s short term incentive plans, due to current economic circumstances, however the chief executive and the three key investment professionals still earned a combined C$8.6 million in total compensation in the fiscal year to March.

This remuneration total is about $3.894 million less than the 2008 fiscal year, when the four executives earned $12.4 million collectively.

Set up in June 2005 and updated in March 2007, the CPPIB has an incentive compensation framework which means the chief executive, the chief financial officer, and three investment professionals – head of private markets, head of public markets, and head of real estate – all have compensation determined by a base salary combined with short-term and long-term incentive plans.

The individual components of those short-term incentive plans will not be paid this year and the key executives will not receive any base salary increases in 2010.

In the past year the chief executive, David Denison, was the CPPIB’s highest paid executive with a total remuneration of $2.9 million for the year; followed by head of private markets, David Wiseman, ($2.49 million); head of public markets, Donald Raymond ($1.67 million), and head of real estate investments, Graeme Eadie ($1.42 million).

The target short term incentive plan is set as a percentage of salary, to which a multiplier, based on actual fund performance and individual performance, is added.

Sponsored Content

Similarly the target long term incentive plans is set as a percentage of salary and are paid at the end of a four-year cycle.

Executive compensation is closely linked to a combination of individual and CPP Fund performance measures, and for 2009, the CPPIB also established a series of non-financial goals including continued diversification of the investment portfolio, and execution of management and operational processes and technologies.

In particular Denison had personal objectives that included continuing to champion and foster the CPPIB’s culture; ensuring the successful integration of the offices in Toronto, London and Hong Kong; overseeing the cooperation of a comprehensive enterprise risk management framework, and building credit capabilities.

In the CPPIB annual report, the board particularly noted the CEO’s strong leadership.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

What does an effective board look like?

Pension fund boards are complex, evolving, collective bodies and the individuals that serve them face unique challenges. The Rotman-ICPM Board Effectiveness Program is a week-long course designed specifically for pension fund trustees that showcases how an effective board looks and behaves. Pension management beneficiaries are delegating to a body that then delegates to an executive,

ESG rethink can add 40 basis points per month: Hermes

Rigorous Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) management can deliver an extra 40 basis points per month according to Saker Nusseibeh, CEO and head of investment at Hermes Fund Managers. “Where it [ESG] really matters for performance is in consistently avoiding bad governance. You can add 40 basis points per month… Per month!” Nusseibeh told a

International reaction to QSuper’s innovation

Australian fund, QSuper’s creation of eight different investment cohorts for its 440,000 default fund members this month has sparked curiosity and admiration from defined contribution experts in the US, the UK and New Zealand. The investment strategies for each group will be focussed on an estimated retirement outcome for that segment, taking into account the

Investors ignore liability matching at their peril

Two high profile pension funds, ATP of Denmark and HOOPP of Canada, have been very successful in managing their assets in two distinct portfolios. But the practice of fund separation, a portion of the portfolio for liability hedging and another for alpha generation, is not common in pension management. It should be. For these two

Home bias in corporate engagement revealed

Investors should take care in selecting corporate engagement firms to ensure the engagement reflects their portfolio holdings, warn academics at Oxford and Maastricht Universities following a new study which reveals a home bias in such activity. As the investment portfolios of large institutional investors become increasingly global, it is particularly important that they carefully select

The power of benchmarking: GRESB comes of age

Now in its fifth year GRESB, the benchmark that measures the sustainability performance of real estate portfolios, has been influential in changing the sector’s performance and environmental impact. Now Nils Kok, executive director of GRESB and associate professor in finance at Maastricht University, says that infrastructure and private equity assets are ripe for a benchmark

Previous