ABP to submit recovery plan as coverage ratio falls 50%

ABP, the world’s third largest pension fund, faces serious underfunding as a result of the financial crisis and will have to submit a recovery plan to De Nederlandsche Bank by March 31.

The fund’s coverage ratio has fallen to 90 per cent at the end of 2008, due to a drop in the actuarial interest rate at the end of the year to 3.6 per cent, and a return on investments for the year of -20.2 per cent.

At the end of 2007 the fund had a coverage ratio of 140 per cent; with an actuarial interest rate of 4.9 per cent and a return on investments of 3.8 per cent. Once the coverage ratio falls below 105 per cent the fund is required to report to the Bank on its plan to eliminate the underfunding within three years, and that the value of the assets will be on the level specified by the Pensions Act within 15 years.

The fund’s chairman, Elco Brinkman, said like other pension funds ABP had suffered greatly from the consequences of the financial crisis, with its assets now sitting at 173 billion (US$223 billion).

“This crisis, which evolved very rapidly in the last few months of 2008, is the worst every in ABP’s history,” he said. “In the last quarter of 2008, the fund lost approximately 22 billion of the almost 80 billion ABP had made with investments after the dot-com crisis between 2003 and 2008. Our focus over the coming months will be on recovering the fund’s financial position.”

At the end of 2008 the fund, which has 2.6 million members, had US$57.7 billion (US$57.7 billion) in fixed income, US$63 billion in equities and alternatives; and US$77.7 billion in other investments.

Sponsored Content

The fund is required to set an actuarial interest rate, equivalent to the swap rate, in order to determine its forecast return on capital. While this now sits at 3.6 per cent, the fund has returned an average of 5.9 per cent over the past 15 years.

 

 

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous