10-point plan for employers and trustees of defined contribution pension plans

Defined contribution company plans began 2009 on the heels of a bruising year. The significant decline in capital markets coupled with extreme investment volatility raises many issues for companies with DC plans. There are numerous issues employers/plan trustees need to address when reviewing their plans this year. These range from the plan’s governance to the choice of low-risk investment options. Mercer’s Dublin office has prepared a 10 point plan that employers and trustees could potentially adopt as they re-evaluate their DC plans and related responsibilities in 2009.

  1. Review the adequacy of DC benefits and consider whether current pension provision is meeting employees’ needs. Economic conditions and future expectations have changed considerably since many DC arrangements were designed. Depending on their ages and time horizons, members may need to adjust their expectations of retirement income. Employers may also need to assess the workforce management implications.
  2. Review DC provider performance. The market for DC provision has evolved with new providers and products entering the market while others exit. Trustees should consider if the existing arrangements continue to meet the investment needs of all members and if performance continues to meet the objectives set when selected.
  3. Review the suitability of investment options. Poor investment choice is likely to be one of the main issues impacting members’ benefits and trustees should consider the current options available to members in light of new industry developments. If the investment range has not been reviewed for some time, consider the membership profile, how this might have changed, how members are making investment decisions and whether the existing range includes a facility for members to manage their investment needs over time.
  4. Review the default investment option. A feature of most DC plans is that the majority of members “end up” invested in the default option; this makes it crucially important for trustees and members. Is it effective in varying investment conditions and over time for members’ changing investment needs? Does it protect members who are close to retirement from annuity risk or market risk, while at the same time catering for members with longer time horizons? As DC schemes develop, the member population becomes more diversified, and consequently the existing default option may no longer cater for all groups of members. There may also be an opportunity to improve the efficiency of the default option (in terms of the risk/reward trade off), given the wider range of investment vehicles now available.
  5. Monitor the choices being made by individual plan members (not in aggregate). Review individual member asset allocations and/or individual members’ rates of return. This type of review can provide good insight into whether your DC plan is working, and can point out areas for improvement, such as member education or fund choices.
  6. Assess the effectiveness of your member communications strategy. This is a good time to revisit financial and investment education. Given the market turbulence and economic uncertainty, what information should be provided to plan participants?
  7. Review and revise your plan’s Statement of Investment Policy Principles (SIPP). In the current market environment, fiduciary risk is high and a review of the SIPP can help minimise this risk.
  8. Ascertain if your plan members are engaged at all. Are they knowledgeable about their savings and retirement plan choices? Given the recent market volatility and economic turmoil, this is a good time to revisit engagement and education about investing and retirement planning. Larger employers/trustees may wish to consider focus groups to find out what members see as their challenges, education needs and barriers to understanding.
  9. Assess what kind of retirement income or replacement ratio employees can expect from the plan. If this is projected to be lower than previously expected, action is required sooner rather than later. Consider revising the scheme design, allowing additional member contributions, or reinforcing the importance of saving more outside the plan in order to secure a comfortable retirement for members.
  10. Review the stability and risk exposures of investment managers in light of the current economic turmoil.  Consider the status of the plan’s investment managers(s) and their commitment to continue to develop their offerings to meet member needs.

Sponsored Content

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous