New guide for implementing climate risks

Cracked Ground From The Indian Subcontinent

The Climate Disclosure Standards Board (CDSB) and the Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB) have worked together to produce a practical guide for companies looking to implement the Task Force on Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).

While more than 600 organisations have supported the TCFD, the implementation of its recommendations have been slow, so CDSB and SASB have drawn on their well-established reporting frameworks to produce the guide that shows companies, in a very practical way, how to implement the recommendations.

Director of research at SASB, David Parham, said there has been great interest from companies wishing to manage their exposure to climate risk, demonstrated by their commitment to the TCFD proposals.

“But one of the challenges has been in companies needing practical resources to implement the recommendations. Through our partnership, and our standards,we can give practical tools to companies to effectively implement.”

The guide is rooted in practical examples with “mock disclosures” created for three fictional companies in the oil and gas, automobile and agriculture industries.

“We chose those industries to show how each of them have very different climate-related risk exposure, and demonstrate how to use the tools to really robustly meet the TCFD recommendations – which can be done in any of those three industries using our guidance,” Parham said.

Sponsored Content

Institutional investors can take comfort in the fact that the frameworks used for disclosure are focused on disclosure information that is material to investors, Parham said.

“Investors can help advocate and encourage companies to use the framework so investors can get the information they need. It is also useful fromthe perspective of seeing how the quantitative metrics can inform an investors’ understanding of howthe companies are performing, and then interpret the effectiveness of a company’s governance of this risk and risk management of its strategy,” he said. “It can help investors see how important it is to have continuity and how KPIs help drive performance.”

It is also important for investors to have an understanding of how different reporting frameworks can work together to enhance the quality of information they are receiving, he added.

When the TCFD released its final recommendation in 2017, its chair Michael Bloomberg, who is also chair-emeritus of the SASB Foundation Board, said the widespread adoption of the taskforce’s recommendations would ensure that the effects of climate change become routinely considered in business and investment decisions.

“Adoption of these recommendations will also help companies better demonstrate responsibility and foresight in their consideration of climate issues. That will lead to smarter, more efficient allocation of capital, and help smooth the transition to a more sustainable, low-carbon economy,” he said in a letter to Mark Carney, chairman of the Financial Stability Board,at the launch of the report.

The premise of the new guide is to demonstrate that the principles-based TCFD recommendations can be less daunting to implement than they might originally appear.

 

 

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

NBIM’s climate advisory board set to manage climate risk and opportunity

Norges Bank Investment Management has established a new climate advisory board. Carine Smith Ihenacho, chief governance and compliance  officer, spoke to Top1000funds.com and explains the task at hand.

Phase down or phase-out: Is there a difference?

The “phase out” or “phase down” of coal use leads us down two different paths with the Thinkin Ahead’s Tim Hodgson arguing that phase out is a choice to save the planet, while phase down is an attempt to save our unsustainable way of life.

Utah Retirement Systems: Why ESG is a waste of time

Divestment doesn't work, scope 3 reporting will tie companies in regulatory knots and ESG integration threatens pension funds long term returns and their ability to finance the transition. Utah Retirement Systems' John Skjervem says the only way to solve the climate emergency is to keep investing in fossil fuels.

Active, in-house and sustainability: The driving factors at AP3

AP3’s ability to actively benefit from volatile markets is rooted in a reform process undertaken by CIO Pablo Bernengo, replacing decade-old, separate alpha and beta allocations with a traditional asset class structures but avoiding silos. Active risk and sustainability go hand in hand, he says, and is a 2023 focus.

NZ Super culls equities, focuses on impact

New Zealand Super has radically slashed the holdings in its passive equities portfolio as it re-aligns the portfolio with a Paris-aligned benchmark. It’s part of the fund’s shift to a sustainable finance focus which includes improving the fund’s already-good ESG profile and a more long-term future focus on impact investing.

Railpen lays out 2023 voting policies; mental health a priority

Railpen lists climate, cyber security and mental health in the workplace amongst its key engagement and AGM voting priorities in 2023.

Previous