Improved disclosure on workforce data

Around 750 of the world’s largest listed companies are being encouraged by investors to disclose more workforce data. These companies have this week been sent the ‘Workforce Disclosure Initiative’ (WDI) survey. Supporting this call for data is a group of 127 investor signatories – including AustralianSuper, PGGM, OPTrust and USS – collectively managing $14 trillion.

Many responsible investors have long recognised the lack of standardised and comparable workforce information made available by listed companies across a wide range of metrics.

For example, a 2017 study found that of 6,441 large companies analysed, only 24 per cent of firms disclosed injury rates and just 15 per cent disclosed employee turnover. Investors are increasingly swinging behind the WDI as a platform for companies to disclose key information on how they manage and protect workers in their operations and supply chains.

 The WDI is run by responsible investment charity ShareAction, in partnership with the Responsible Investment Association Australasia (RIAA) and Canada’s SHARE. Funded by the UK’s Department for International Development (DFID), the initiative’s ultimate goal is to ensure better quality jobs in alignment with the UN’s Sustainable Development Goal 8, which calls for decent work for all. The first step is securing better data and there are promising signs in this regard.

Last year, 90 companies provided data in response to the WDI survey. Disclosers included 21 of the biggest 100 companies in the world and represented 16 different countries. These companies employ around 8.3 million people in their global operations and have business relationships with more than 1.5 million supply chain organisations.

The first ever WDI conference, held in early June in London, was a further sign of growing momentum in the drive for better workforce data. Over 100 representatives from companies, investors, governments and civil society came together to discuss why it is crucial for all parties that workforce data improves. To drive home that point, specific topics covered at the conference included gender equality and fair wages for the global workforce.

Sponsored Content

The message from investors at the conference was clear: they need better data to make sound investment decisions and be informed and engaged shareholders. Other themes provoked interesting and constructive debate. One speaker argued for a shift in mind-set from seeing workers as a cost, to seeing them as an asset which is crucial to the success of the business. Linked to this was the question of whether the interests of investors, companies and workers can ever fully align. Here the mood of the conference was one of hope and determination: yes they can align. But it is not enough to say they can align, instead they must align and delegates should do all in their power to ensure that happens. The benefits of a stable, well-motivated workforce have been clear to many asset owners for some time. After all, companies with high turnover rates, poor health and safety standards and unmotivated staff contain additional risks for the investor seeking to generate stable, long-term returns.

Encouragingly, there is an increasingly strong business case for treating the workforce as an asset and improving policies and practices on a wide range of issues. Research has found that 75 per cent of UK businesses who paid the real Living Wage reported increased motivation and retention from employees. Additionally, if companies work towards being more inclusive and diverse they then benefit from diverse talent.

Finally, there is also growing evidence of financial benefits of engaging on environmental, social and governance (ESG) issues for both companies and investors. The often neglected S of ESG is fundamental to this and – along with other initiatives – the WDI is helping to bring this to the fore.

Corporates nervous of discloure

Despite the growing business case for engaging with workforce issues, there is a sense that many companies still feel nervous about disclosure and are hesitant to be the first among their peers.  However, companies should recognise that, facing more scrutiny from investors, consumers and increasing legislative requirements, they would be better placed to get ahead of the curve.

Earlier this year the Australian Government introduced a Modern Slavery Act. The act requires Australian businesses with revenues over A$100 million to report annually on the risks of modern slavery in their operations and supply chains, as well as the action they have taken to address those risks. There have also being growing legislative requirements about disclosing diversity data globally. For example, since 2017 the UK has required all companies with 250 or more employees to produce a gender pay gap report. Australia has similar reporting requirements.

 As well as its core purpose of generating better workforce data, the WDI aims to continue growing its capacity to facilitate a forward-thinking and open dialogue about vital workforce issues between investors, companies and other stakeholders. It was apt, then, that the conference touched on the question: what would the world be like in 10 years’ time if the largest publicly traded companies undertake robust workforce disclosure?

 There are many things this world would be. It would be much easier to have honest discussions around workforce issues when more and more companies come forward, and current disclosers don’t feel like they’re alone in sharing data. It would be much easier for companies to learn from the best practice of others. It would be much easier for asset owners to have informed engagements with their managers, companies and, ultimately, allocate capital to firms providing better quality jobs.

 There is widespread support for creating a working world with less inequality: one where all workers enjoy decent work, are paid a living wage and work in good conditions. While there is a long way to go to achieve this – and many different organisations need to collaborate to get there – the WDI’s early momentum is promising.

 With that big picture in mind, focus moves to the shorter-term and, specifically October 21 – the deadline for companies to disclose to the 2019 WDI survey. By then it is hoped many more of the world’s flagship companies will have taken a vital step on the road to workforce transparency.

James Coldwell is investor engagement manager for the Workforce Disclosure Initiative at ShareAction in London.

Leave a Comment

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

La Caisse’s oil exit pays off as renewables portfolio pulls ahead of fossil fuels

Divesting from the oil sector has been a boon for La Caisse’s performance, as the Canadian pension giant says its energy investments have earned billions in value-add compared to the benchmark since the inception of its climate strategy. Head of sustainability Bertrand Millot unpacks the fund’s approach in an interview with Top1000funds.com.

Sort content by

Real assets, public equity the key as Oregon PERS gets climate mandate

The US state of Oregon is on the cusp of passing a legislation that will require the $100 billion Oregon Public Employees Retirement System to invest in clean energy wherever possible as it aims for a net-zero portfolio by 2050.

Reconciling ethics and returns in pursuit of a sustainable economy

Can investors and governments balance financial returns with social equity, or will short-term gains prevail? Anastassia Johnson, researcher at the Thinking Ahead Institute, tackles the complex debate about what makes a just transition.

Path to net zero requires honest dialogue about sustainable investing

Leading institutional investors at the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Harvard said the industry could benefit from having a franker conversation about sustainable investments, both in terms of what climate goals are achievable on the path to net zero and what is behind the pushback on ESG funds.  

Why adaptation alone won’t solve the climate change conundrum

Is a narrowly defined transition likely to fail? The Thinking Ahead Institute’s climate transition working group has been exploring this thesis, writes the Institute’s co-founder Tim Hodgson.

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Kentucky CERS: Trustees push back on hurried oil and gas investment

The board of trustees for the $10 billion Kentucky County Employees Retirement System has knocked back the fund's request to invest in an oil and gas fund. It also expressed frustrations that a specially convened board meeting was called on short notice.

Previous