WEF lays out global risks ahead: Cost of living and climate dominate

The world faces a set of risks that feel both wholly new and eerily familiar. The Global Risks Report 2023 explores some of the most severe risks we may face over the next decade. As we stand on the edge of a low-growth and low-cooperation era, tougher trade-offs risk eroding climate action, human development and future resilience.

The war in Ukraine has disrupted the return to a ‘new normal’ following the COVID-19 pandemic, according to this year’s WEF Global Risks Report.

The 2022-2023 Global Risks Perception Survey (GRPS) identified the energy supply crisis, the cost-of-living crisis, rising inflation, the food supply crisis, and cyberattacks on critical infrastructure as among the top risks with the most significant potential global impact in 2023.

It also flagged concerns over the failure to meet net zero targets, the weaponization of economic policy, the weakening of human rights, the debt crisis, and the failure of non-food supply chains.

The report states that all the current risks are converging to shape a unique, uncertain, and turbulent decade to come.

Respondents to the GRPS (more than 1,200 experts across academia, business, government, the international community, and civil society) see the path to 2025 dominated by social and environmental risks, driven by underlying geopolitical and economic trends.

Sponsored Content

Respondents expect the cost-of-living crisis, the economic down-turn, geo-economic warfare, the climate action hiatus, and societal polarisation to play out over the next two years.

They will also have ramifications for the next ten years. Some respondents felt optimistic about the outlook for the world in the long term, predicting limited volatility with a relative – and potentially renewed – stability over the next ten years. Yet, over half expect progressive tipping points and persistent crises leading to catastrophic outcomes or consistent volatility over the next ten years.

‘Global risk’ is defined as the possibility of an event or condition occurring that would negatively impact a significant proportion of global GDP, population, or natural resources.

The report explains that some of the current global risks are close to a tipping point and understanding them is vital to shaping a more secure future.

Leave a Comment

Why traditional investment committees can amplify group biases

Why traditional investment committees can amplify group biases

Investment committee meetings, a governance cornerstone at every asset owner organisation, run the risk of amplifying group biases and social dynamics, and can push the IC towards recommending more extreme investment positions collectively than the average of their individual views. Bernhard Scherer, head of portfolio implementation at ADIA, unpacks the thesis in a new paper.

Sort content by

The problem with UK government pressure on pension funds to diversify

UK politicians are urging the country's pension funds to invest less in Gilts and more in riskier and complex assets including young UK companies, and infrastructure. Railpen's John Greaves, head of investment strategy and research explains the various problems with the plan.

SWIB talks active equity as a Best Ideas portfolio takes off

Susan Schmidt, head of public equities at SWIB, talks about the fund's new Best Ideas portfolio. Despite technology's reach and market efficiencies, there is still ample room for a fundamental approach where human skill and a unique investment culture find mispriced opportunities.

As Japan’s GPIF builds out PE, new research flags measurement method

For investors struggling to develop better ways to measure private equity fund performance, researchers at the giant Japanese fund, GPIF, suggest an alternative measurement model that compares private and public assets more accurately.

APFC mulls self evaluation and more board members in governance revamp

In a recent board meeting, trustees at APFC heard from governance experts on the importance of self evaluation; why rules around trustee contact with investment staff are important and how more board members could support oversight at the sovereign wealth fund.

PFZW nails down costs; economies of scale pay off

Dutch fund PFZW manages to keep a lid on costs which fell to 0.42 per cent of invested capital last year, comfortably below its target of no more than 0.50 per cent of assets. Economies of scale pay off despite private markets accounting for well over three quarters of total.

What does it take to succeed at scale?

As the Australian superannuation funds evolve and get bigger they face a question of whether to copy the organisational structures of their bigger, more sophisticated Canadian counterparts, or find their own way that more adequately befits some of their unique features and better serves members.

Previous