Time to mend relationships in investment management

A new KPMG report, ‘Renewing the promise: Time to mend relationships in investment management”, shows the investment management industry should work to rebuild trust with investors through a ‘back-to-basics’ client relationship approach, increase knowledge sharing, and bolster corporate
governance and risk management transparency.

KPMG International commissioned Datamonitor to undertake the research which was launched at Fund Forum International in Monaco.

Overall, the results show that better communication holds the key to future success. These lines of communication should flow not only from investment managers to their clients, but also, crucially, from investment managers to intermediaries and to regulators, as they will play a fundamental role in repairing the trust that has been broken.

This message of the need for more effective communication manifests itself in a variety of ways, including calls by investors and intermediaries for additional training and transparency on product and strategy, for explicit vocalisation by investment managers of their adherence to an industry best practice code of conduct and for more direct, face-to-face time with managers.

In terms of the breakdown in trust, the research highlighted that financial intermediaries – client-facing advisors – in particular, are perceived as being untrustworthy and lacking knowledge, perhaps as a result of poor education by investment managers on complex products and risk management practices.

Sponsored Content

In fact, 77 per cent of investors overall felt that intermediaries are less trustworthy than politicians.

To combat this, 58 per cent of institutional investors believe that investment managers should provide financial intermediaries with better product training in order to help them regain client trust, a sentiment matched by 75 per cent of investment managers themselves.

Responding to the research, Tom Brown, partner and EMA Region of Investment Management, KPMG in the UK, said: “At this time of market turbulence and broken trust, the investment management industry should adapt and change to re-engage investors. Open communication amongst all market participants is particularly critical, and investment managers and intermediaries must forge collaborative, knowledge-based partnerships, focused solely on the client. Only by implementing a joined-up approach, supported by better corporate governance and risk management, can the needs of the investor truly be met.”

Notably, the research showed that managers do not have faith in their own senior-level management being able to drive this necessary change, especially with regards to risk management and corporate governance procedures:
65 per cent of investment managers globally cited lack of vision by top management as the major obstacle to change, leaping to a staggering 90 per cent of managers questioned in the US.

A lack of vision at the top is not the only obstacle to change and progress, however. The report also showed that the inevitable cascade of regulatory change is likely to significantly hamper the industry, with 81 per cent of respondents believing more regulation will remove opportunities for innovation going forward.

There are also significant concerns regarding the cost impact of a new regulatory regime; 72 per cent of participants feel that a regulatory clampdown will seriously increase costs for investment managers, and 63 per cent think investment managers will not be able to pass on these associated costs to their clients.

Commenting on regulation, James Suglia, global head of Investment Management Advisory, KPMG in the US, said: “The investment management sector is braced for regulatory change, and is ready to learn its lessons from the financial crisis. More than ever, the “time is now” for true engagement between the industry and the regulators to shape the future of the investment management landscape. Regulation has the potential to deliver a new lease of life through market stabilisation, information sharing and product transparency, but only by taking a consultative approach can the correct results be achieved.”

Not everyone is agreed on where this regulation will fall though. For example, 53 per cent of institutional investors believe that risk management and internal controls will be more strictly regulated in the future, whilst investment managers feel the focus will be on leverage limitations (77 per cent).

David Seymour, partner and global head of Investment Management, KPMG in the US, concluded: “Events of the past year have once again put the issue of trust into sharp relief, and it is fair to say that the credibility and reputation of the investment sector has been damaged. It is little wonder that investors, faced with the realities of plummeting stock markets and portfolios, have questioned the integrity of the investment management industry. This research clearly
shows that constituent parties in the investment chain are not communicating with each other to best effect. The industry should find ways to open these lines of communication once more, and by doing so, rebuild the trust of
investors.”

Click here to download the report.

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Cost shifting and the freezing of corporate pension plans

This paper, which examines the impact of the trend in the US of corporate funds freezing their defined benefit funds and offering defined contribution plans, shows that net of the increase in total DC contributions, firms save 2.7-3.6 per cent of payroll per year, and over a 10-year horizon they save 3.1 per cent of

The arithmetic of “all-in” investment expenses

In the January/February issue of the Financial Analysts Journal, Jack Bogle, founder and former chief executive of the Vanguard Group, looks at the “all-in” investment expenses including not only expense ratios byt transaction costs, sales loads and cash drag. He highlights, in particular, how damaging these costs can be over the long run, and reaffirms

How to estimate the equity risk premium

Given the importance of equity risk premium, it is surprising how haphazard the estimation of equity risk premiums remains in practice. This paper by Aswath Damodaran at the New York University Stern School of Business examines a number of different approaches to determining the equity risk premium and why different approaches yield different values. It

Risk parity and beyond

This paper analyses whether the use of uncorrelated underlying risk factors, as opposed to correlated asset returns, can lead to a more efficient framework for measuring and managing portfolio diversification. The paper, by academics at EDHEC Business School and SYMMYS, acknowledges that the ability to construct well-diversified portfolios is a challenge of critical importance in

Emerging equity markets in a globalising world

Even though there has been dramatic globalisation over the past 20 years it still makes sense to segregate global equities into “developed” and “emerging” market buckets, according to a paper by Columbia and Duke academics. The research, which has important policy implications for institutional and pension fund management, shows that while correlations between developed and

Citigroup: a case study in managerial and regulatory failures

This article by Arthur Wilmarth from George Washington University Law School uses Citigroup as a case study to demonstrate the question of whether bank executives and regulators are able to supervise and control today’s complex megabanks. The study shows that post-mortem evaluations of Citigroup’s near-collapse revealed that neither Citigroup’s managers nor its regulators recognized the

Previous