Ghana wins Equity World Cup

Ghana will win an “Equity” World Cup, according to research by S&P Indices which compares the relative performance of equity markets from January to May 2010 in the countries that have qualified for the football world cup.

The simulation follows the football draw, with the winner, measured by equity market performance, going through to the next round (see graph attached).

According to S&P, Ghana’s victory underlines a strong showing from a number of emerging and frontier markets, with the nation returning an equity performance of 50.73 per cent in the first five months of 2010.

Nigeria, beaten by Ghana in an all-African semi-final, also performed strongly with a growth of 19.97 per cent. The fact the Chilean market was down 5.48 per cent but the country still made the semi-finals is testament to the weak average return across markets in Europe and North America, S&P says.

While Spain remains the bookmakers’ favourite for the football world cup, its equity performance of -37.49 per cent rules it out of the equity world cup at the group stage.

Similarly a number of other European markets have had disappointing returns in equity markets for the first half of this year, reflected by Denmark (-10.46 per cent) the only one to reach the last four.

Sponsored Content

According to the S&P simulation there will be a number of football upsets in the equity world cup, with the current World Cup holders, Italy, defeated by Japan; and England defeated by the USA.

The S&P Equity World Cup was simulated with data drawn from the S&P Global BMI, comprised of the S&P Developed BMI and the S&P Emerging BMI.

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Macroeconomic risk and hedge fund returns

This paper estimates hedge fund and mutual fund exposure to newly proposed measures of macroeconomic risk that are interpreted as measures of economic uncertainty. The academics, from Georgetown and Stern, find the resulting uncertainty betas explain a significant proportion of the cross-sectional dispersion in hedge fund returns. However, the same is not true for mutual

Active ownership

Academics from the London Business School, Boston College and Temple University, examine the outperformance of US public companies following corporate social responsibility engagement.

Capturing illiquidity premiums

This paper commissioned by the Norwegian Ministry of Finance investigates the possibilities for the Government Pension Fund Global (GPFG) to profit from liquidity premiums in  illiquid investments. It looks at the empirical evidence for the presence of liquidity effects in a broad range of asset classes: listed equities, corporate bonds, treasury and agency bonds, and

A trustee guide to factor investing

This research by academics at Tilburg University and the VU University Amsterdam, looks at the hurdles of implementing factor investing. It translates those into a checklist for implementing factor investing. The research, conducted for Robeco, finds that three approaches to factor investing are emerging and conducts case studies to examine how these approaches are implemented

Manager risk contribution in a multi-manager portfolio

This paper by MSCI creates a framework in order to answer the question: given a portfolio of managers, how does the active risk of each manager relate to the active risk of the portfolio? Asset owners often measure manager risk (the active risk of each manager) and have difficulty relating it to the contribution each

How active is your real estate fund manager?

Using detailed data from IPD, this paper looks at the holdings and performance of 256 UK commercial real estate funds from 2002-2011. It concludes the more active funds, those further from benchmark holdings, outperform but are not accompanied by higher risk.   To access the paper click here How active is your real estate fund

Previous