Distressed Kentucky fund regroups

Among the 10 different pension and insurance schemes within the $16 billion Kentucky Retirement Systems portfolio lies one of America’s most distressed pension plans.

At only 17 per cent funded, the Kentucky Employees Retirement System (KERS) Non-Hazardous Plan is the biggest headache for chief investment officer David Peden. Speaking from the fund’s headquarters in Louisville, Kentucky – the US state best known for its horse racing and fried chicken – Kentucky-native Peden is under more pressure than the average pension fund CIO.

“Our investment decisions are under the microscope because of the funded status of the KERS plan,” he explains. “It’s a challenging place to be because even good investment returns will really have little impact on the health of the KERS system.”

And the investment returns Peden is dealing with are poor.

Rock-bottom bond yields and lacklustre equity gains have taken their toll on the portfolio, which reported a loss of 0.52 per cent in 2015. The worst performers were non-US and emerging market public equity (the allocation to emerging markets was axed through 2016) and hedge funds, in a result that falls short of the portfolio’s actuarially required rate of return of 7.5 per cent. Two of the 10 plans require a lower rate of return of 6.75 per cent.

Yet together with a new five-strong investment team, Peden is determined to turn Kentucky Retirement Systems’ fortunes around. He’s midway through altering the portfolio along fresh guidelines to cut costs and complexity and reduce risk.

Sponsored Content

“This is a complicated problem and we are putting as much intellectual firepower on this topic as we can,” he says, although he does acknowledge the challenge of recruiting dynamic teams in Kentucky. “We are not fully staffed; it’s a difficult place to recruit because Kentucky has only a small investment community.”

A first step has involved cutting the allocation to hedge funds by $800 million. Kentucky first invested in hedge funds five years ago and Peden stresses that this year’s lacklustre results are less of an issue in ditching the allocation than the desire to cut costs.

“Half of the hedge fund allocation will definitely be sold; the other half is under review. It is hard for hedge funds to sit within the context of a less complex and less expensive philosophy. It doesn’t mean they are wrong. In a [time of low inter-bank lending rates], while many may still be doing their job, it is difficult to justify the fee.”

Peden and his team will jettison the allocations that are duplicated in the main portfolio and don’t provide “enough bang for their buck”, such as equity beta, and credit beta in fixed income.

Global macro and trend followers, fixed income arbitrage and convertible arbitrage will remain for now. Peden is also exploring using managed accounts, rather than limited partnership structures, to improve transparency.

“I can’t say where we will invest the money from the hedge fund allocation yet; I don’t know the answer. I will in the next month or so.”

KERS Non-Hazardous has just over half its portfolio in equity, comprising a passive core with active management. The fund has increased its allocation to equity in recent months to try to achieve the 7.5 per cent long-term return goal; 2015’s best-performing allocations were US equity, private equity and real estate. Nevertheless, gradually reducing the equity allocation in line with a more risk-averse strategy is another of Peden’s priorities going forward.

“Over the last three years, the non-US equity allocation, and the dollar impact of that, have been a big drag on the portfolio. It is time to have the conversation about what is the proper allocation between US and non-US equity.”

The current allocation of the pension assets is 25.6 per cent to US equities, 25.2 per cent to broad market international equities, 10 per cent to private equity, 10 per cent to absolute return strategies, 8 per cent to real return strategies, 7.2 per cent to credit fixed income, 6.8 per cent to global fixed income, 5 per cent to real estate, and 2.2 per cent to cash or short-term securities.

The fund has relationships with 105 managers and about half of those are in private equity.

“We are looking to have fewer, more meaningful manager relationships,” Peden says.

As of June 2016, KERS Non-Hazardous had $3 billion of commitments across 42 private equity managers (66 partnerships) gaining exposure across the spectrum of strategies, including buyout, venture and growth, and credit-oriented strategies.

Peden is hopeful that the first signs of a rotation are under way as a consequence of the US election result. The selloff in bonds and rally in US equities led by sectors closely tied to economic growth, like banks, plus surging treasury yields, could be the beginning of a new era.

“[For] three years prior to the US election, it has been a very difficult period to have a diversified portfolio,” he says. “Value is doing better [since] the US election. To me, it seems that the psychology of the market has tipped, post-election; it is saying we are coming out of recession. The traditional stock-picking market is coming back.”

If he’s right, it could be just the change Kentucky needs.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

Pension funds and social housing: a perfect match?

Pension funds and social housing: it looks like a perfect match as schemes in the United Kingdom seek long-term, index-linked cash flows and housing associations, the not-for-profit providers of this type of affordable housing for low income households, hunt the long-term finance they can’t access via banks. Broad residential housing represents just 1 per cent

Learning from Danish funds’ stable alternative

Despite upturns in equity and bond prices sending 2012 returns into double digits at many large Danish funds, it appears that successfully implementing infrastructure initiatives remains the holy grail of Danish institutional investing. Instead of merely basking in 12.9-per-cent annual returns, Industriens Pension, for instance, used its 2012 results announcement to make a commitment to

Who should co-invest in private equity?

Some pension funds have hit on a lucrative strategy to extract more value from their private equity portfolios. The £34-billion ($51.6-billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme, the United Kingdom’s second biggest pension fund for university and higher education staff, is expanding a private equity co-investment strategy begun in 2008. It’s a model whereby schemes portion some investment

Norway’s GPFG enters the property game

Last May, when Norway’s Government Pension Fund Global bought 4 per cent of the Formula One motor racing group from private-equity firm CVC Capital Partners, its goal was clear. The sovereign wealth fund, which invests Norway’s oil revenues, wanted the inside track on Formula One’s IPO in Singapore, scheduled for June. Instead, the GPFG’s foray

Investors add to credit cycle

Reaching-for-yield — the propensity to buy riskier assets in order to achieve higher yields — is believed to be an important factor contributing to the credit cycle. This Harvard Business School finance working paper analyses this phenomenon in the corporate bond market. The paper’s authors Bo Becker and Victoria Ivashina show evidence for reaching for

Gunning for diversity, dynamism and due diligence

The new low-return, high-volatility environment requires broadly diversified portfolios, dynamic decision-making and rigorous due diligence, which is beyond the internal capacity of most small funds under $10 billion, warns Russell Investment’s global chief investment officer Peter Gunning. He says smaller funds must decide if it is cost effective and even possible to internally manage investment

Previous