CalPERS assumes lower returns

The California Public Employees’ Retirement System has defined its 10-year capital market assumptions, which are the essential input for its four-yearly asset liability modelling (ALM) and, ultimately, for the asset allocation in its reference portfolio.

Determining the capital market assumptions is the first item in a six-step process CalPERS uses to set its policy portfolio in ALM workshops.

This year’s assumptions, which the internal staff presented to the board, showed much lower expected returns and higher expected volatility for CalPERS’ strategic investment classes than those developed for 2013.

As a result, one of the fund’s consultants, Pension Consulting Alliance, advised that “these latest inputs will very likely translate into lower long-term expected compound returns for the range of strategic portfolio options the investment committee will consider during the 2017 ALM process”.

The capital market assumptions the CalPERS internal team proposed, after input from its consultants and other players in the industry are:

Asset class                  compound return (%)           volatility (% standard deviation)

Sponsored Content

Global equity              6.8                                           17

Private equity              8.3                                           25.5

Fixed income              3                                              6.6

Real assets                   5.8                                          12.6

Inflation                      2.8                                           8

Liquidity                     2                                              1

 

The return estimates the $323 billion fund derived were modest compared with some others in the industry. For example, in private equity, its return estimate of 8.3 per cent is significantly below the projected return assumption of its private-equity consultant, Meketa, which forecasts 9.6 per cent. This is primarily because CalPERS has a lower expected return for global equity than Meketa. Both expect a premium for private equity above global equity of about 1.4 or 1.5 per cent.

All asset assumptions are based on inflation and a real risk-free rate, with assets then divided into three categories – low, medium or high risk premium.

Input from one of CalPERS’ other consultants, Wilshire, shows return prospects across all asset classes have been declining for decades, following the downward trend in interest rates. Core fixed income remains low, and the risk premium for every other asset class is anchored to fixed income.

Once the capital market assumptions have been agreed upon, the process for developing a new strategic asset allocation will begin. As at June 30, 2016, CalPERS asset allocation was:

 

Public equity               51.1%

Income                        20.3%

Real estate                   9.3%

Private equity              8.9%

Inflation                      6.0%

Liquidity                     1.5%

Infrastructure              0.9%

Forestland                   0.7%

Leave a Comment

Ohio STRS warns of higher US recession risk; prioritises liquidity

Ohio STRS warns of higher US recession risk; prioritises liquidity

The State Teachers Retirement System of Ohio has warned of a “material” increase in US recession risk compared to last year as the fund braces for a wider, “negatively skewed” distribution of outcomes in the next 12 months. It came as the mature plan, which is 81 per cent funded, is tilting to fixed income and new asset classes like liquid alternatives over equities.

Sort content by

Risks are multi-faceted and evolving: Litterman

If Robert Litterman were a CIO of a public pension plan he would not try to hit an “unrealistic return target”. Amanda White speaks to him about risk, quants, asset allocation and climate change. There is a serious problem with US public pension funds and the “unrealistic commitments and unrealistic return targets” they have set,

UK local authority funds question “bigger is best”

UK local authority schemes are under pressure to merge. It’s their turn to suggest ways in which pooling investments, or adminstriation, could achieve the economies of scale necessary for survival, but many are resisting the notion that “bigger is better” when it comes to investments.   The United Kingdom’s local government pension schemes have begun

Finding wriggle room in North Dakota

The monthly income pouring into the $1.3-billion North Dakota Legacy Fund arrives as thick and fast as fracking technology and new pipeline networks can draw the state’s oil and gas reserves to the surface. But investment strategy at the fund, set up in 2008 when it was portioned 30 per cent of the tax dollars

Innovating investment beliefs

The concept of investment beliefs is the basis for strategic management and, while widely used in other parts of the world, is “innovative” from a US perspective, Allan Emkin, managing director of Pension Consulting Alliance, says. In a session at the Risk Summit, convened by World Pension Forum and Conexus Financial, publisher of conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com, Emkin

Assessing reality in US public funds

Distinct regulation of United States public pension funds that links the liability discount rate to expected return on assets, rather than to the riskiness of their promised benefits, sets them apart – in a bad way. US public funds have underperformed other pension fund cohorts because of higher allocations to risky assets. Arguably, regulation is

Who should co-invest in private equity?

Some pension funds have hit on a lucrative strategy to extract more value from their private equity portfolios. The £34-billion ($51.6-billion) Universities Superannuation Scheme, the United Kingdom’s second biggest pension fund for university and higher education staff, is expanding a private equity co-investment strategy begun in 2008. It’s a model whereby schemes portion some investment

Previous