Shared investment objective critical to portfolio resilience: Bridgewater

Karen Karniol-Tambour. Photo: Jack Smith

The stars aligned in the 2010s when a series of structural conditions stacked up favourably for global investors. Coming out of a decade defined by two major crises – the dotcom bubble and the GFC – the 2010s saw cheap valuations and a depressed economy needing to heal.  

Low inflation, increasing globalisation, pro-business policy and steady economic growth have together helped the average 70/30 developed world stock-bond portfolio to return 8.5 per cent in 2010s, outperforming the previous five decades, according to analysis by Bridgewater Associates.  

However, co-chief investment officer of the world’s largest hedge fund, Karen Karniol-Tambour, warned that these perfect conditions will be hard to replicate in the 2020s, and it’s high time that investors start building portfolio resilience.  

“I think, for any CIO sitting with the allocation that they have, what you definitely can’t do is be confident that you will get the 2010s again,” she told the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at the University of Toronto earlier this week.  

“[They need to think] ‘I don’t want to have a portfolio that is reliant on getting the amazing 2010s to repeat itself – what I want is something that’s a little more resilient to a range of options, knowing that the world has shifted in a way where a range of options might occur.” 

Resiliency can be defined with several characteristics, she said, including narrower range of outcomes, lower tail-risk outcomes, less likelihood of sustained period of underperformance and higher average return across the environments.  

Sponsored Content

In practice, Karniol-Tambour said investors can use “incremental decisions” such as shifting existing asset allocation, the types of exposures they hold within a particular asset class, or allocating to strategies that can hedge the tail risks.  

However, the biggest challenge in building resilience, she said, is for investors to remember that a part of their portfolio will need to be explicitly assessed relative to how the rest of the portfolio performed, rather than as standalone performance.  

It matters a lot to make it clear to that resilience-building part of the investment team that the plan is for them “to have a more consistent return or to only perform well when things are going poorly” in the rest of the portfolio, she said. 

“You’re not telling the person [responsible] that ‘you did a bad job’. You’re saying that was the plan.  

“If you don’t govern it that way, then the person who manages that bottom asset is going to say ‘wait a minute, we just had a great growth year, and I had this very low return relative to the rest of the portfolio, I better change my strategy to not have that happen to me again’.” 

Understanding, not avoiding risks 

Chief investment officer of the C$25 billion ($18 billion) pension OPTrust, James Davis, echoed the sentiment and said it’s governance can be a huge challenge when the objective is building resilience.  

“Resilience is not about avoiding risks, it’s about understanding them, and it’s about managing them,” he said.  

“We define risk not as volatility or return. We define it in terms of the probability of becoming under-funded. The reality is that the risk-free rate is not high enough that we could just invest in risk free assets and earn the returns we need to pay pensions, so we have to take risks.  

“We’re not trying to grow that funded status, just try to keep it stable. 

James Davis

“We do rigorous due diligence in all of our deals, and in our fund and direct investing. We treat risk as a scarce resource. We don’t incentivise excessive risk-taking.” 

Getting the board to understand this objective can take rigorous communications sometimes, Davis said, but that needs to be done.  

“It’s amazing how our board gets distracted by returns, and the media feeds into that.  

“At the end of the day, we can have a very good stable, potentially even improving funded status and have a negative rate of return. Think bonds that hedge your liabilities, then bonds have a bad year and yields went up. 

“Then our board is like ‘well, you say you did good, but did you really do good?’ 

“Boards in general, our board as well, are line item focused. This is one of the things you try to overcome by going to a total portfolio approach, but it’s hard to break that habit.” 

Karniol-Tambour said that at the end of the day, the first step to building resilience is to create shared understanding of the investment end goal within an organisation and its investment team.  

“Being able to really have that shared understanding of why over the long-term resilience is so valuable, especially be able to demonstrate mathematically how damaging it is to have ups and downs [in returns]. 

“People who think themselves as long term investors – given that we have requirements along the way to make payments – not being able to compound and having big ups and downs makes a big difference. 

“So creating that shared understanding, and then being able to have that understanding pushed through to the actual activities people are doing, to the actual choices they’re making [is important].” 

Leave a Comment

Investors head back to EM as US tech capex bill mounts

Investors head back to EM as US tech capex bill mounts

US tech mega caps are grappling with surging capital expenditure, casting doubt on whether the premium attached to these stocks in the AI super cycle has become detached from fundamentals. Investors are now turning their attention to emerging markets equities where they have the opportunity to buy into the AI hype at a much lower price.

Sort content by

Pension funds confront the question of who owns AI

As the use of AI within asset owners evolves, organisations are grappling with the governance question of where the strategy and accountability sit. Darcy Song looks at the treatment of AI organisationally within a number of high-profile funds, including OTPP, AustralianSuper, CPP and Norges Bank.

URS bets on nuclear to power AI and lower emissions

Next-generation nuclear energy, and the money pouring into it, will truly change the world, according to CIO of Utah Retirement System John Skjervem. It’s a lonely position as the CIO of a public pension fund but one Utah is embracing as it builds out early-stage investments in nuclear energy as part of its alternative energy portfolio. He speaks to Sarah Rundell in an exclusive interview about how investing in transformational energy technologies can be part of prudent investment management.

Managing volatility and inflation: Constant rebalancing shores up UK’s lifeboat fund

A keen focus on rebalancing, and best in class systems, allows the UK’s £31.2 billion Pension Protection Fund to effectively implement a dynamic hedging strategy for one of the UK's biggest LDI portfolios. Sarah Rundell reports.

Velliv reset: More Danish funds lean into low cost DC model

In Denmark’s fiercely competitive commercial pension industry, Velliv was quick to take action with a root-and-branch overhaul of its pension provision when it experienced a drop in returns in the first half of 2024. It sacked its active equity managers, scaling up internal active strategies and low-cost, index-based investments instead, and stopped allocating to its $4.3 billion alternatives allocation. Thor Schultz Christensen, deputy chief investment officer at Velliv, unpacks the change.

Ohio sounds warning bells on PE liquidity logjam

Farouki Majeed, chief investment officer of the $23 billion Ohio School Employees Retirement System, has highlighted worrying signs in private equity that resulted from a backlog of exits, including industry murmurs that some GPs are having to borrow money to operate their business because LP fees are drying up. In an interview with Top1000funds.com, Majeed unpacks why its 12 per cent PE allocation is shielded from the rout.

Temasek likely to miss 2030 climate target dragged by aviation, energy investments

Temasek chief executive Dilhan Pillay says the sovereign investor is likely to miss its 2030 interim climate target, as exposures to the aviation and power generation sectors are crimping the investor’s ability to reduce portfolio target emissions. But the $339 billion fund is sticking to its net zero by 2050 goal, stressing the slower decarbonisation pace "reflects the realities of the broader global economy."