GPTB shows pension transparency improvement

The transparency of pension fund disclosures has improved in the past year across the 15 countries and 75 pension funds measured in the Global Pension Transparency Benchmark, a collaboration between Top1000funds.com and CEM Benchmarking.

The GPTB, now in its second year, examines the transparency of disclosures across four drivers of value, namely cost, governance, performance and responsible investing.

In this second year, governance disclosures showed the biggest improvement with the average score of 65 out of 100 marking an improvement of seven from last year’s average score of 58. Governance was the best overall average score of the four factors.

The Canadian funds continue to excel in this category which CEM Benchmarking’s Michael Reid says is consistent with their reputation for excellent governance.
In last year’s review CEM noted that governance scores were most closely correlated with the overall score: good governance produces positive results and creates greater incentive (or perhaps less disincentive) to be transparent with stakeholders.

This year responsible investing disclosures showed an equal correlation with governance. Good governance allows funds to move beyond simply managing assets and towards addressing wider environmental and social issues.

The overall average performance score was 62, a slight decline from 64 last year and the second highest scoring factor after governance. The performance factor was the only factor to have a decline in the score this year. Average country scores ranged from 43 to 84.

Sponsored Content

The average country cost factor score was 48, unchanged from last year’s review, with individual scores ranging from 10 to 77.

The average country score for responsible investing was 49 out of 100 up from 42 in last year’s review, marking the biggest relative improvement among any of the four factors. These improvements mean that responsible investing is no longer the lowest scoring factor overall, having surpassed the average score for the cost factor. Improvements to disclosures were evident across all components and most countries. RI did continue to have the greatest dispersion of scores reflecting that countries are at different stages of implementing responsible investing within their investing framework. Average country scores ranged from 11 to 77, a slightly smaller range than last year.

“It was apparent from the reviews that many funds are actively taking steps to improve communications on responsible investing to stakeholders. In particular, many funds are expanding their disclosures to include quantifiable measures and progress towards climate related targets,” Reid says.

The GPTB ranks countries on their disclosures and found the following countries to be the outstanding performers in each category:
• Canada for governance
• The Netherlands for cost
• The Netherlands for responsible investing
• The United States for performance.

The Netherlands continued to lead the way in cost disclosure with the highest country score of 77. Scores were tightly banded from 71 to 89 and the top four cost factor scores were held by Dutch funds.

The Netherlands also ranked number one in the responsible investing factor, usurping last year’s winner of Sweden, with a score of 77. Both countries had improved disclosures over the past year. The Nordic countries – Sweden, Denmark, Finland, and Norway – continued to do very well on RI as a region, with all countries receiving scores well in excess of the overall average.

In the performance factor, the components with the highest scores continued to include asset mix and portfolio composition and risk policy and measures. Similarly the lowest scores were seen for asset class returns and value added and benchmark disclosures.

The US funds continued to lead the way, with an average country score of 84 for the performance factor. The US funds typically had extensive and good quality reporting across all performance components.

To examine the results for 2022 across factors, countries and the underlying funds click here.

Leave a Comment

Aware Super maps AI exposure as it sharpens whole-of-portfolio risk focus

Aware Super maps AI exposure as it sharpens whole-of-portfolio risk focus

Australia’s third-largest pension fund Aware Super is taking stock of its investment exposure to AI and the initial analysis suggests at least 15 per cent of the fund’s assets are exposed to the thematic. In a project deep dive, head of investment strategy Michael Winchester says finding the portfolio's true concentration around AI will require looking beyond simple dollar aggregation.

Sort content by

TPA to usher in clearer accountability at CalPERS

CalPERS chief investment officer Stephen Gilmore said the $650 billion fund’s upcoming shift to a total portfolio approach will sharpen investment accountability and help it focus capital allocation decisions on fund-level objectives.

Blue Owl co-founder on doing fewer things better

In a fireside chat at FIS Harvard, Blue Owl co-founder Doug Ostrover said the fast-growing alternatives shop won’t expand “just for the sake of hubris” as it pursues market leadership through a tightly defined set of offerings. He also unpacked the recent redemption pressure the firm was under and how it plans to move past it.

Reports of America’s decline greatly exaggerated: Kotkin

Reports of America’s decline as a geopolitical and economic power are exaggerated, and the noise investors should learn to ignore is really only the presidency itself, celebrated historian Stephen Kotkin told the Fiduciary Investors Symposium at Harvard.

Responsible investing remains ‘common sense’: MassPRIM chair

Trustee of Massachusetts PRIM and state Treasurer Deborah Goldberg said investing with a stewardship and sustainability-conscious approach remains “common sense” for the $116 billion fund, though she said it has been harder for the investor to access some ESG-related information from managers and companies.

How the Future Fund built a TPA culture that scales

The total portfolio approach has allowed Australia’s sovereign wealth fund to capture the themes that will power markets and economies for decades to come, said director of thought leadership Craig Thorburn – but that doesn’t mean it’s not hard to scale.

Crisis the real test of LP-GP relationships

When Blue Owl Capital came under sustained media pressure over redemptions to its private credit funds, Michael Hitchcock, chief executive of the South Carolina Retirement System Investment Commission (RSIC), didn’t waver. He thinks that what allocators learn from their managers in a period of crisis tells them more than any official due diligence could.

Previous