Canada to allow retail contribution to new SWF

Mark Carney

Canada has established its first national-level sovereign wealth fund with a seed of C$25 billion ($18.3 billion) to underwrite “nation-building” projects like ports, mines and energy infrastructure.

In an announcement on Monday, Prime Minister Mark Carney says the SWF, dubbed the Canada Strong Fund, will invest alongside domestic and international private investors to drive “economic transformation”. The announcement comes amidst a global push for sovereign wealth funds to involve themselves more deeply with nation-building activities, with Australia’s Future Fund recently having its mandate amended to require it to consider “national priorities” when making or managing investments.

The Canada Strong Fund will operate at arm’s length from the government as a Crown corporation – sharing the same status with CPP Investments – and be led by a chief executive and a “qualified independent” board of directors. The organisation will be overseen by the Minister of Finance and National Revenue.

The initial seed will be released by the government over the next three years, with the expectation that returns on investments will give the fund a boost in AUM over time. But there will also be a retail investment product which will allow “individual Canadian investors to participate in Canada’s growth and benefit from its financial returns”.

The latter is an unusual funding mechanism as sovereign wealth funds typically manage pools of state capital, derived from natural resources or foreign exchange reserves. Some SWFs also issue bonds to diversify their funding sources, such as Abu Dhabi’s ADQ and Malaysia’s Khazanah Nasional Berhad.

The government also flagged the possibility it would explore more diversified funding sources in the future. Canadian advocacy and research group Common Wealth suggested this could be from common assets such as natural resources rent, use-fees on public property and public-private partnership equity; value created in the economic system such as budget surpluses; or “market concentration fees” such as levies on anti-competitive practices.

Sponsored Content

A “Canada Strong Fund transition office” will also be established to engage with other market participants and regulators.

“Through the Canada Strong Fund, all Canadians will have the opportunity to share directly in these benefits. This is our country, this is your future, and we are building it together,” Carney said.

 Details are scant on how the pool of capital will be invested, and it is still unclear as to whether the fund will house an internal investment team or leverage external managers, what type of assets it will invest in and what its return targets will be. Details around mandate, governance and implementation plans will be bedded down in the coming months.

Canada is the latest in a slew of countries that have established SWFs or kicked off the process to do so in recent years. US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to establish a US SWF last February, though its specific shape remains unclear as the 90-day deadline to release a plan for the SWF came and went without further news.

President Donald Trump has loosely described the objective of the US SWF in the executive order as being for the “sole benefit of American citizens”. Stanford expert Ashby Monk believes that to mean it is likely to be a sovereign development fund – a type of SWF “that strategically pursues both commercial returns and specific domestic policy goals”, the research paper says.

Indonesia established its second SWF Danantara last February “to manage and optimise government investments and assets from state-owned enterprises”.

The Canada Strong Fund joins other state investment vehicles including Canada Infrastructure Bank, Export Development Canada and the Canada Growth Fund to underpin investments in essential projects. “Comprehensive mandate reviews” will be conducted to ensure clarity of roles in the federal financing system.

Leave a Comment

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

Portfolios built for the old world will be severely tested as emerging forces rewrite the rules of investing. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that geopolitical and macroeconomic upheaval, together with the disruption wrought by AI, should force asset owners to rethink the structure and composition of portfolios.

Sort content by

Atleast 2023 until ‘normal’ returns

It will take at least an additional two years from now to eradicate the COVID-19 health pandemic despite various coronavirus vaccines being rolled out warned health experts at the FIS Digital 2020. Dr Ian Norton, former global head of WHO’s Emergency Medical Team Initiative, said a long road to normal still lies ahead.

“Black Swan” an excuse for inaction

Black Swan has become a cliché for any bad thing that surprises us. But the onset of COVID-19 was not a Black Swan according to the academic who invented the term and laments its misuse. So why does the finance industry continue to be ignorant or unable to look beyond traditional finance models in assessing global risks?

Diversity: The data challenge of 2020s

Assessing, managing and changing diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) is set to become the data issue of the 2020s, as asset owners turn their attention to the power they have to advocate for change in the companies they invest in, and the firms that manage their money.

Merger progresses company ESG reporting

SASB and IIRC merge to form the Value Reporting Foundation, a move that is in direct response to calls from global investors and corporates to simplify the corporate reporting landscape.

NZ Super debates currency risk

NZ Super's recent five-year reference portfolio review saw much debate over currency risk, with the discussion elevating to the board - an unusual situation for the fund whose internal IC usually makes recommendations to the board.

Democracy intact: Kotkin

The victory of Joe Biden over Donald Trump in the US general election is a “double repudiation” not just of Trump but of the “democracy in crisis crowd” who thought American democracy was under threat, argues historian and author Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Affairs at Princeton University.

Previous