TCFD disclosures are not hitting the mark

In June, G7 nations endorsed mandatory climate-related financial disclosures based on the Taskforce for Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) framework recommendations. A recent report identified that only 23 per cent of Canadian listed companies are reporting in alignment with those recommendations, exposing its public entities to the risk of diminishing their access to capital while limiting investors’ access to their returns.

Although late in 2020 Canada’s largest pension funds made news by publicly declaring that they wish to see issuers disclose to both the SASB and TCFD frameworks, of the 228 companies listed on Canada’s S&P/TSX Composite Index only 23 per cent provided a clear statement indicating that their climate reporting align with the TCFD recommendations, with an additional 14 per cent expressing a desire to align with those recommendations and 54 per cent with no mention at all.  Although, the extractives and minerals processing and the financials sectors led the way in terms of TCFD-aligned reporting, the study discovered that there were no TCFD-aligned reports found in the healthcare, renewable energy resources & alternative energy, and services sectors.

And how are investors responding to this lack of climate reporting?

To get a pulse, Canadian ESG Advisory firm Millani Inc. focused its recent Semi-Annual Institutional Investor ESG Sentiment Study on climate reporting, and more specifically, on investors’ expectations for issuers disclosures to the TCFD framework*.

The study concluded that the Canadian investment community is mindful of the challenges of reporting in line with the TCFD, with most respondents suggesting that issuers start their reporting now but to consider that ­reporting will need to be iterative and progressive going forward.  However, regulators and investors are expected to become less forgiving with time.

Sponsored Content

Regarding emissions disclosures, 100 per cent of investors surveyed said they are assessing scope 1 & 2 and 75 per cent are looking to assess scope 3. Meanwhile, 90 per cent of those issuers who have TCFD-aligned reports, provide scope 1 and 2 emissions, and 50 per cent report scope 3 emissions.  Much of this sentiment aligns with the proxy voting trends that the market witnessed in 2021, with multiple shareholder resolutions asking for climate strategies or disclosures to scope 3, surprisingly getting mainstream investor support.

But the study also highlighted those investors find that TCFD disclosures are less insightful than most had anticipated. Given that issuers can choose which climate scenarios they can use, investors expressed that companies are putting forth scenarios that provide positive results, and not providing a thorough disclosure of potential risks and opportunities to their business strategies.

Early in 2021, there were many organizations that made net-zero commitments.  While these announcements were initially well-received, the investor community quickly realized that for some, there was little substance behind the targets.  The report collected investor’s sentiments to issuer target-setting and noted that they are most interested in seeing interim targets and an articulation of how the organization plans to get there.

The study outlines those investors themselves were surprised by the accelerating pace of change in ESG regulations and at the rate at which investors and corporates are progressing on this topic.   A well-articulated climate strategy is becoming a necessity for any issuer, and investors alike.

While having been driven by Europe until recently, North America is about to undergo seismic shifts as the new US administration begins to focus its regulatory and legislative agenda towards climate change. As much as the markets are already feeling pressures, several new regulatory initiatives are expected to be announced to drive the markets forward.

As the world, and its regulatory and its financial systems prepare for COP26, one thing is certain. Further changes are expected, and the stakes are increasing with each passing day for issuers, and investors alike.

*Millani’s Semi-Annual Study was published in two distinctive reports which can be read in conjunction with one another and can be found on our website

  • TCFD Disclosure Study: A Canadian Perspective
  • Semi-Annual Sentiment Study of Canadian Institutional Investors: Climate Change & TCFD-Aligned Reporting

Milla Craig is the founder and president of Millani.

Leave a Comment

America’s net zero opportunity

America’s net zero opportunity

Research from Princeton University plots a Blueprint for how the US can achieve net zero emissions in the next decade showing the key is overcoming execution challenges including the infrastructure deployment and the mobilisation of capital and labour.

Sort content by

The energy transition: Why renewables outperform fossil fuels

A joint report by the International Energy Agency and the Centre for Climate Finance & Investment at Imperial College examines the risk and return proposition in energy transitions. It looks at publicly traded renewable power and fossil fuel companies in advanced and developing economies calculating the total return and annualized volatility of these portfolios over 5 and 10-year periods. 

Data, measurement, impact and change

This session examined the regulatory views around the world and the need for global standards for global investors.

Healthy scepticism – the challenges of sustainable investing

This session examined the challenges investors face including ideology, working with boards, culture and scalable investments.

Achieving net zero – the implementation challenge

This session looked at the challenges of implementing those goals in portfolios – what behaviour changes are needed and how do investors allocate?

China’s pledge to achieve carbon neutrality by 2060

Achieving carbon neutrality by 2060 will require radical changes. Formidable challenges lie ahead, but also investment opportunities with renewables, electric vehicles and energy storage set to benefit.

Net zero infrastructure: A practical roadmap

The challenge for infrastructure asset managers to achieve Net Zero by 2050 is immense. It requires detailed strategic planning, clear interim targets, critical investment, transparent insight and regular reporting, as well as strong leadership and clear governance frameworks.

Previous