Reaching SDGs’ ‘low-hanging fruit’

Infrastructure investment is particularly suited to integrating the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) because of its long-term nature, said Kevin Uebelein, chief executive of Canada’s Alberta Investment Management Corporation.

“Infrastructure investment is successful only if we are successful as a society,” he told delegates at the PRI in Person in San Francisco. Uebelein said infrastructure investment was an umbrella to many of the SDGs and that without sustainable infrastructure, other efforts to pursue the SDGs were often hampered or unsuccessful.

“If there isn’t clean electricity, you won’t be able to see through the fog to drive your electric car,” he said.

He added that AIMCo wanted to make sizeable investments in infrastructure that helped meet the UN’s SDGs. He noted that when the pension fund “crosses the Rubicon” and becomes an owner of an infrastructure asset, rather than just an investor, it wields much more influence.

“Once we are an owner with a seat on the board, we can begin a strategic conversation,” he said.

But the SDGs challenge for-profit investors. Uebelein noted that despite the overwhelming infrastructure gap, the availability of “investable” infrastructure remains small. “There is a large pile of infrastructure capital chasing too few investable projects,” he said.

Sponsored Content

Scott Mather, CIO, US Core Strategies, at PIMCO told delegates he is pushing for the development of SDG bond issuance.

“The green bond market is growing but this could [instead] be a subset of an SDG bond market to address a broader swathe of issues,” Mather said. “Sustainable bonds that meet the SDGs would be bigger than the green bond market.”

He said fixed income, the largest capital market, had a lead role in meeting SDGs because of its long-term nature.

“Bond issuers come to the market every year and have a unique ability to influence what goes into the marketplace,” Mather said.

He also advocated that companies report according to SDGs and advised investors to have a “focused approach” when drawing related information from companies.

“It is easy to have an impact that will reduce risk,” Mather said. “There is so much low-hanging fruit; narrow your approach.”

Maya Chorengel, partner at private equity group TPG, which runs the $2 billion Rise Fund, offered insight into ways of measuring impact in SDG investment. Rise invests across multiple sectors, spanning healthcare to energy and education, and has developed a unique methodology to express impact that involves collecting data from companies to extract line outcomes. A third party audits the impact, which is presented to investors along with the financial returns.

AIMCo is working on how best to measure the impact of SDG investment, Uebelein said. The process is made difficult because the fund is still developing its own SDG reporting processes.

“When engaging with companies, we are encouraging them to think about the SDGs and how to report, but we need to walk in this market ourselves first,” he acknowledged.

Collaboration between public and private investors to meet the SDGs is vital because the demand for capital is so huge. Development institutes by themselves can’t solve the SDGs, said Sérgio Pimenta, regional vice-president, Africa and the Middle East, at IFC – the World Bank’s private-sector arm – which focuses on crowding private-sector investment into impactful efforts.

East Capital chairman and CIO Peter Elam Håkansson talked about the creativity needed to invest in sharemarkets according to SDGs, noting the opportunities in China particularly.

“There are lots of solution providers in China that have responsible owners,” Hakansson said. “We are outperforming the Asia index and also doing good for the environment.”

[vc_subscription_cta s_cta_text=”Sign up to our weekly newsletter for regular news flashes and industry insights.” text_color=”#0c0c0c” bg_color=”” button_url=”/subscribe/” button_text=”Subscribe” btn_color=”” btn_bg_color=”#c0091f”]

Leave a Comment

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing’s case for scale

Impact investing has come a long way in the past two decades, going from a niche strategy to a $1.5 trillion industry, but there are still challenges for it to reach institutional scale due to the lack of products and insufficient evidence of outperformance in some parts of the market.

Sort content by

‘Built different builds different’: Embracing neurodiversity in investment

Embracing neurodiversity might not just be the key to unlocking collaboration, creativity and productivity in investment teams, it could also be the key to better returns, the Fiduciary Investors Symposium has heard.

How long-term investors should think about stock-bond correlations

Asset owners that are long-term investors should be wary of the conventional model of assessing the stock-bond correlation that is based on several “implicit assumptions”, the Fiduciary Investors Symposium has heard. Instead, the question investors should be asking is: are bonds a hedge or a risk?

AI already driving ‘biggest transformation in the economy we’ve ever seen’

The economic impact of AI can be better measured if every job is broken down into its component tasks, and the impact on each of those tasks is valued. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that on this basis, we’re seeing the biggest economic transformation ever.

Long-duration storage, digitisation key to cracking the energy transition

Packing more energy into smaller batteries is one crucial technological development to help achieving the energy transition within the necessary timeframes, the Fiduciary Investors Symposium has heard, and there are enormous economic opportunities ahead as industry races to unlock solutions.

Winds of change blowing through private credit markets

The influx of capital and interest into the private credit market has spawned new managers and offerings, but asset owners are increasingly alert to the fact that not every one of them is built equal, and even tiny losses during the credit cycle can eat significantly into long-term returns.

Changing geopolitical risks are getting harder to manage – but here’s how

The changing nature of geopolitical risks has made them harder to manage, even though the adversaries to an American-led world order have remained nearly the same over the decades. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard a key difference is that everything that happens everywhere is now interconnected.

Previous