Subscribe Login
Asset Owner Directory

Sampension

Sampension is Denmark’s third largest pension manager. Sampension is a customer-owned community with around 300,000 customers. Sampension’s team includes approximately 300 employees and offer both labour market and company pensions.

Country

Denmark

AUM

$45

Performance (%, 1YR)

6.10

Chief Executive

Hasse Jørgensen

Chief Investment Officer

Henrik Olejasz Larsen

Asset allocation

25.7% Shares

30.4% Bonds etc. including interest rate hedging

11.9% Bonds etc. with credit risks

32% Other assets

Website
View the annual report
Global Pension Transparency Benchmark country system description

Asset allocation as of December 31, 2024. All information is as per the most recent annual report or other publicly available data via the fund's website

Top1000funds.com related articles

Danish investors shun the US but complete divestment ‘unlikely’

Danish pension investors are pulling capital out of US Treasuries amid tensions around Greenland, but a complete divestment from the world’s biggest market will hurt Danish funds’ performance and ultimately their pensioners more than the US government’s balance sheet.

Darcy Song

January 22, 2026

Denmark’s Sampension: Liquid markets signpost illiquid dangers

Investors are piling into alternatives to escape low returns in liquid markets. But Henrik Olejasz Larsen, CIO of Denmark's Sampension, warns liquid markets signpost trouble ahead in alternatives, especially private equity.

Sarah Rundell

August 30, 2022

Denmark’s PKA goes for wind farms

The top-five Danish pension fund, PKA, has made a bigger push into alternatives than its peers, and a good chunk of that allocation comes from direct investment in offshore and onshore wind farms.

Sarah Rundell

April 09, 2018

Sampension seeks more control

As the Danish labour market pension fund puts more into alternatives and illiquid assets, it is also in talks with managers to increase its control over investment decisions and lower its costs.

Sarah Rundell

June 28, 2017

PRI governance review to look at differential rights

The PRI has received many queries following the move by six Danish funds to abdicate as signatories over governance concerns. The association is holding a governance review that among other things will discuss the prospect of differential rights among signatories.   When six Danish funds, with a combined $300 billion, decided to leave the PRI

Amanda White

March 12, 2014

Europe, alternatives pay for Danish Sampension

The herd mentality of investors has been agonised over for as long as markets have been around. The dilemma is often raised of whether to participate in or shun market trends, but the DKK150-billion ($27-billion) Sampension has succeeded recently with a selective approach. It has fully embraced the institutional diversification movement by building a significant

Dan Billingham

September 25, 2013

Asset Owner Directory
Fund NameCountryAUM ($B)ArticlesMore Info

Canada Pension Plan Investment Board (CPP Investments)

Canada$52293View Info

Malaysia – Khazanah Nasional

Malaysia $367View Info

Monetary Authority of Singapore

Singapore$3004View Info
View more funds

Fiduciary Investors Podcast Series

Listen to Podcast

Subscribe now to

Name
Our partners

Top1000funds.com is the market leading news and analysis site for the world’s largest institutional investors. It focuses on leading the global investment industry to continuous improvement through case studies of best practice in governance and decision making, portfolio construction and efficient portfolio management, fees and costs, and sustainable investing.

The publication pushes the industry to question whether status quo processes and behaviours to tackle risks and opportunities will be sufficient in the future, and actively campaigns for diversity, sustainability, transparency, innovation and better alignment of fees in the investment industry.

Top1000funds.com is read by investment professionals in more than 40 countries.

Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | Cookie Policy | AI Editorial Policy