How to predict your PE manager’s performance

There are an estimated 1,600 private equity firms around the world in capital-raising mode at the moment, offering fiduciary investors a smorgasbord of alternatives, split on regions, style, size, stage and sector categorisations. Some recent good news for investors is that, for private equity at least, there is now evidence of performance persistence.

Research from global alternatives advisor Preqin shows that the early returns from private equity funds, before they reach maturity, are actually fairly good predictors of final returns, contrary to popular opinion.

Fund managers typically launch a new offering as they come to the investment period for their previous PE fund, which will average about four years after the previous fund closed. With the previous fund being less than half-way through its life cycle, the question has been whether its early returns are much of a guide to manager skill.

After analysing 5,300 PE funds, including about 2,500 buyout and venture funds with sufficient maturity to be part of the research, Preqin compared the funds’ performance during their fourth year with their performance at maturity. They also performed the same analysis for funds in their sixth year and looked at the proportion of funds which change quartile form year to year. The results are interesting. The main points are:

•      early quartile rankings for both buyout and venture capital funds are an excellent predictor for future relative performance,

•      half of the buyout funds ranked in top quartile in year four go on to be top quartile at maturity, with 75 per cent beating the median, while 60 per cent of venture funds in top quartile at year four maintain top quartile position at maturity with 76 per cent beating the median,

Sponsored Content

•      poor relative performance early on in a fund’s life proves to be extremely difficult to turn around. Just over half (51 per cent) of buyout funds in the bottom quartile in year four remain there at maturity, while 60 per cent of venture funds in the bottom quartile at year four maintain this position at maturity.

•        By year six, quartile rankings are even more important. A total of 67 per cent of top quartile buyout funds in year six maintain this position at maturity, with only 11 per cent failing to beat the median. A total of 73 per cent of venture capital funds maintain their position in the top quartile, with only 5 per cent failing to beat the median. Conversely, only 11 per cent of bottom ranked buyout and 7 per cent of bottom ranked venture funds in year six are able to turn things around and beat the median at maturity.

Tim Friedman, Preqin senior manager and author of the report, says that the results of this work indicate that investors should pay attention to a fund manager’s quartile ranking for recently launched funds and those considering purchases on the secondaries market should be extremely wary of bottom-quartile funds.

However, not all funds perform to type. A significant minority – 12 per cent – of bottom-quartile buyout funds at year four are able to achieve top-quartile status at maturity.

Leave a Comment

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest favours institutional-first managers as retail exodus pressures private credit

Nest, the largest workplace pension in the UK, says that private credit managers who prioritise institutional clients will be more favourably viewed. The £61 billion ($82 billion) fund has awarded a £450 million ($605 million) US direct lending mandate to Crescent Capital this month, citing the manager's institutional-client-first approach as a key attraction.

Sort content by

Concerns over private equity leave pension funds wary

Institutional investors are clearly attracted to private equity, but remain wary of the sector for its perceived lack of transparency and ability to be measured, high fees and a sense that they cannot invest into the sector as truly equal partners. “It’s clear that now is a time with a lot of flux in private

Costs cast increasing doubt over hedge fund relevance

The inability to scale hedge fund exposures and risks, has led many large investors, like CalPERS this week and ATP last year, to exit their hedge fund programs. Complexity continues to be a drain on the relevancy of hedge funds, but importantly cost is driving the agendas of these investors. As AQR’s Cliff Asness admits,

Why Sunsuper likes hedge funds

One of Australia’s largest superannuation funds, the $27 billion Sunsuper, is adamant that it gets value out of its large hedge fund program. This is against the grain in Australia, where many large funds (with the exception of the Future Fund) choosing not to invest in hedge funds. So why does Sunsuper favour hedge funds?

Japan’s GPIF allocates to smart beta

The $1.3 trillion Government Pension Investment Fund of Japan will use factor investing, or smart beta, as a third way of implementing equity mandates, alongside active and passive, following a six-month research project conducted by MSCI that investigated how to best implement the growing interest in factor exposures.   The research project conducted by MSCI

Capital provider: Australia’s Sunsuper

The $26 billion Australian super fund, Sunsuper, is investing in an increasing amount of exclusive unlisted asset deals. Chief investment officer David Hartley says the difficulties of banks in Europe in particular have led the fund down the path of increasing the amount of debt investments in its unlisted exposure. Much of this has been

What’s the impact of the stock:bond correlation?

The correlation between stocks and bonds in a rising interest rate environment can turn positive. So given the likelihood of a rate rise, what should asset allocation look like if investors are forward looking?   One of the growing trends in asset and risk allocations is to adopt a forward-looking view driven by macroeconomics, rather

Previous