NBIM seeks long/short, market-neutral strategies amid volatility

Norges Bank Investment Management (NBIM) which oversees Norway’s sovereign wealth fund managing the country’s oil and gas revenues, is expanding its investments in hedge funds to include mandates to Asian, US and European long/short external managers. The number of managers and invested value will depend on market opportunities, said Erik Hilde, global head of external strategies at NBIM.

NBIM already invests in internally managed long/short funds. The investor also allocates approximately $90 billion to 110 external fund managers, all of whom follow bottom-up fundamental investment strategies.

“Everything will continue to be managed within our mandate and within the limits we have for deviations from the index,” said Hilde, who added that fees will be structured similarly to NBIM’s existing external mandates.

The strategies will be held in separately managed accounts. Hilde said that under the strategy, NBIM’s external managers will borrow stocks held in NBIM’s large index portfolio to position on falling prices, selling them in the market. “This way the fund avoids being net short in any company, even though some of the mandates will be long/short,” he explained.

According to NBIM’s public invitation to tender, the investor plans to award mandates across long/short and market-neutral strategies with initial funding for each mandate ranging from $150 million to $500 million. NBIM is looking to allocate mandates to single-country long/short equity strategies in Australia and Japan, regional long/short strategies focused on Europe, and long/short equity strategies in the US, where it is looking for expertise in healthcare and technology in particular.

The open invitation to external managers reflects growing investor interest in long/short equity strategies as market volatility and stock dispersion create fresh opportunities for active managers. NBIM’s move also comes as some investors grow increasingly concerned that equity market valuations look stretched, increasing the risks for long-only investors at a time when the impact of President Trump’s policies on the US economy, particularly his tariff plans, remains unknown.

Sponsored Content

Equities account for 70 per cent of the total assets under management. NBIM  has a 27.7 per cent allocation to fixed income and a 1.9 per cent allocation to unlisted real estate. Last April, Norway’s finance ministry rejected NBIM’s petition to invest in private equity citing higher fees, lower transparency of information, and the need for a broad political consensus.

Today’s new uncertainty contrasts with last year. NBIM attributes its 2024 return of 13 per cent to gains in global equity markets supported by solid corporate earnings, more optimistic growth expectations and declining inflation expectations.

Still, in 2024 the overall contribution from security selection was negative. External management made a positive contribution, but the negative contribution from internal management was larger. “The security selection strategy is not expected to contribute positively to the fund’s relative return every year, and the results for 2024 followed a period of five consecutive years of positive contributions from security selection,” states the fund.

NBIM has delivered annualised returns of 7.5 per cent over the past decade.

The fund had a 0.6 per cent loss in the first quarter of 2025 largerly weighed down by equities, which recorded a loss of 1.6 per cent or 415 billion kroner ($39 billion) driven by fluctuations in the tech sector.

Leave a Comment

Dutch pension funds face tech reckoning, warns central bank

Dutch pension funds face tech reckoning, warns central bank

The Netherlands' Central Bank has warned the country's pension funds that their €150 billion ($177 billion) investments in tech companies, representing almost 43 per cent of their listed equities portfolios and 8 per cent of their total balance sheet, is at risk from a potential AI bubble.

Sort content by

The future is quant

The pace of technological change and advances in machine learning and quantitative methods will result in a “shake out” in investment management according to Campbell Harvey, Professor of Finance at Duke University.

CalPERS board’s divestment dilemmas

The merits of tracking divested dollars, and the value of data illustrating what the pension fund has missed out on was the topic of much debate at the December CalPERS board meeting. In 2021 the fund will review six divestment programs across tobacco, firearms, coal, Iran, Sudan and emerging market equity principles.

Active US large cap adds nothing

Active investing in US large caps has detracted value from US pension fund portfolios and exposures should be indexed, according to new research by CEM Benchmarking. This could result in huge cost savings and have implications for how pension funds spend their active budget.

Strategic factor investing

Institutional investors should consider factor investing as a strategic decision, according to a new paper from Dirk Broeders at Maastricht University and Kristy Jansen from Tilburg University.

Is factor investing still working?

A large number of long-only multi-factor strategies have performed disappointingly over the past three years. Some have called into question the usefulness of solutions based on factor diversification but recent research by EDHEC suggests this doesn’t hold up against an even remotely serious investigation.

Danish fund cuts managers for better ESG

The €9.5 billion DanishPædagogernes Pension, PBU, is in the process of consolidating the number of managers in its listed equity portfolio. The decision at the fund - which has around 10 large, focused equity mandates - is linked to an ambition to reduce the number of companies in the portfolio in the belief that fewer companies in the 42 per cent actively-managed equity allocation allows greater ESG oversight.

Previous