CalPERS reduces equities universe

In the first story of an exclusive series examining investment portfolio innovation at CalPERS, Amanda White looks at the global equities portfolio where the universe of stocks was recently halved.

The public equity allocation of the $469 billion CalPERS is the fund’s largest contributor to returns and also the largest contributor to volatility.

With a huge portfolio and a return target of 6.8 per cent the investment staff at CalPERS are constantly challenged to meet these return demands in a smooth distribution for its two million workers.

The fund is dominated by equity risk with interim chief investment officer, Dan Bienvenue, saying risk models estimate the fund has about 90 per cent growth risk. As it looks to reduce complexity the equity portfolio recently came under review.

“We are long equity risk and we are comfortable with that. We don’t have a choice of not investing, where we invest is the question,” Bienvenue told Top1000funds.com.

The public equity allocation sits at just over half of the fund’s assets (52 per cent) and last year returned 36.3 per cent. Private equity had a greater return at 43.8 per cent but currently only has a 7.6 per cent allocation.

Sponsored Content

In addition, the public equity portfolio contributes just over 70 per cent of the forecasted volatility.

Managed almost entirely internally (80 per cent) the public equity allocation is split between cap weighted (71 per cent) and factor weighted (29 per cent).

In terms of a volatility contribution by asset class the public equity cap weighted proportion is over half of the entire portfolio at 54 per cent. It is within this allocation, entirely passively managed, that the team recently innovated by significantly narrowing its benchmark.

“Historically we held the entire market, down to 98 per cent of capitalisation, which was about 11,000 securities,” Bienvenue says. “When we ran a number of diversification metrics on that we found we could cut our holdings by half and not impact diversification. It also improves complexity and allows us to avoid some operational challenges, for example around currency, which take time.”

The result was a reduction in the number of stocks in the cap-weighted portion – about 35 per cent of the fund’s entire portfolio – from 11,000 to 5,000 securities in the second quarter of this year.

The factor weighted portion of the equities portfolio is to assist in avoiding drawdowns, says Bienvenue who before taking on the role of interim CIO was managing investment director of global equity.

“One of the assumptions of the CAPM model is that investors are homogenous when it comes to risk, we don’t believe that,” he says. “We put that sleeve in the portfolio because our aversion to significant drawdown is greater than our utility for upside.”

CalPERS is currently undergoing an asset liability modelling process which includes setting assumptions and model portfolios that will best meet the fund’s return targets.

The current portfolio devised four years ago to meet a 7 per cent return target would yield 6 per cent today on revised asset class return predictions.

“We are looking at candidate portfolios for achieving our new target of 6.8 per cent,” Bienvenue says. “We don’t have a low risk choice, but we want to expose the portfolio to compensated risks.”

At the total fund level public assets are managed at the low base of 4 basis points with total costs of around 23 basis points.

The fund has an ambition to increase its allocation to private equity and is investigating the use of leverage.

“If we wanted to just keep the fee down we would put everything in public markets but that wouldn’t get the drivers of return.”

Bienvenue says the use of leverage will not just add to returns but will act as a diversifier.

“If we were to take a long-only portfolio and try to achieve a number like 6.8 per cent we would put everything into some sort of equity. Leverage will allow us to pull some more diversifying assets like fixed income and real assets which are all things we will work through the board with,” he says. “We are looking at our comfort with trading out one risk – equity – for another in leverage which has financing and operational risks.”

 

More stories on CalPERS

Co-investment, diversification drive CalPERS’ PE push

CalPERS’ new asset allocation to take on more risk

 

 

Leave a Comment

Dutch pension funds face tech reckoning, warns central bank

Dutch pension funds face tech reckoning, warns central bank

The Netherlands' Central Bank has warned the country's pension funds that their €150 billion ($177 billion) investments in tech companies, representing almost 43 per cent of their listed equities portfolios and 8 per cent of their total balance sheet, is at risk from a potential AI bubble.

Sort content by

Factors aid manager selection

Investors, including the $194 billion State Board of Administration of Florida (SBA), are using factor analysis to decompose returns, select active managers and negotiate fees.

CPPIB active in emerging markets

The Canada Pension Plan Investment Board has increased its focus on emerging economies, using active management to access local expertise and maximise its advantages of scale.

Future Fund revamps equities

Australia’s sovereign wealth fund has revamped its equities portfolio to take on deliberate factor risk and target idiosyncratic risk. The fund’s head of equities, Björn Kvarnskog, explains.

MERS: real assets, non-US markets

MERS chief investment officer Jeb Burns still finds value in active management as he seeks to up the fund’s exposure to emerging markets, and other non-US locales, in equities and real assets.

Norway reviews GPFG strategy

Norway is looking into whether GPFG, the world’s largest sovereign fund, should take on more diversifying assets and expand its tracking error. The fund’s ESG performance is also under review.

Consequences of short-term investment

Equity managers are skewed to potentially sub-optimal short-term investment, a new study shows, with little understanding of opportunities missed, risks ignored and hidden costs.

Previous