US instos battle for proxy rights on boards

The ongoing saga of US investors’ right to have a say in corporate elections continues with the Council of Institutional Investors (CII) refuting the Business Roundtable’s (BRT) claims that the proxy rule will injure shareholder interests.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved a rule in August granting certain long-term investors – shareholders who have held 3 per cent of stock for three  years according to BRT – proxy access at US public companies, but due to the Business Roundtable-Chamber lawsuit, the rule was not put into effect.

According to BRT, proxy access will have a number of unintended consequences including weakened effectiveness of the board of directors and increased costs.

BRT also claims that proxy rules will be hijacked by certain activist shareholders who will use the rules as a tool to advance an agenda that conflicts with the interests of the majority of shareholders.

CII, an association of public, union and corporate pension funds with combined assets in excess of $3 trillion, has refuted BRT’s claims that the rule will injure shareholder interests, saying it warrants scepticism due to BRT’s own description as “an association of chief executive officers of leading US companies”.

“Proxy access will make companies more responsive to their shareowners and more vigilant in their oversight of management,” said CII’s executive director, Ann Yerger.

Sponsored Content

“The basic shareowner right is widely accepted in many countries. US investors deserve this same, fundamental protection.”

Proxy access gives shareholders a voice in corporate board elections by letting them place their nominees for director on the company’s proxy card when they are dissatisfied with the board and want to run their own candidates.

The ongoing saga of proxy rights has brought together 15 pensions funds (including California Public Employees’ Retirement System, the New Jersey Division of Investment and New York City Employees’ Retirement System), with the CII to lodge a “friend of the court” brief to the US Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit on January 27 to outline their support of SEC’s proxy rule.

CII has also welcomed the report of the Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission, whose findings echoed many of the insights of the July 2009 report of the Investors Working Group (IWG), an independent, non-partisan commission co-sponsored by CII and the CFA Institute Centre for Financial Market Integrity.

The commission concluded the crisis was avoidable and was caused by numerous factors. These included:

  1. widespread failures in financial regulation
  2. dramatic breakdowns in corporate governance
  3. an explosive mix of excessive borrowing and risk by households and Wall Street that put the financial system on a collision course with crisis
  4. key policy makers were ill-prepared for the crisis, and
  5. systematic breaches in accountability and ethics occurred at all levels

“The report is a thorough, painful reminder of the massive failures of oversight that paved the way to the brink of financial Armageddon in 2009,” said CII’s Yerger.

“Gaps in regulation, failures of will on the part of regulators, and complacence on the part of corporate boards contributed to the debacle that cost millions of Americans their jobs and devastated their retirement savings.”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Why integrated reporting makes sense: Robert Eccles

Robert Eccles has been trying to change the nature of corporate reporting for more than 20 years. He has been an advocate for supplementing financials with information on non-financial factors that are leading indicators of financial results – such as product development, customer satisfaction and the development of intangible assets. The premise is those companies

Opportunities in Europe

Investors and academics agree that political developments in Greece are important because they may shape how financial markets will respond to future political situations in the Eurozone. But according to Olivier Rousseau, the executive director of the FFR, the French pension reserve fund, there is more hype outside of the Eurozone on the implications of

More evidence big is better in pension funds

A pension fund that has 10 times more assets under management has on average 7.67 basis points lower annual investment costs according to a working paper from authors at De Nederlansche Bank, that explores the relationship between pension fund size and investment costs. Written by Dirk Broeders, Arco van Oord and David Rijsbergen the paper

European investment plan requires public private collaboration

The two largest institutional investors in the Netherlands, PGGM and APG, have responded to the European Commission’s investment plan, urging the commission to call on institutional investors to collaborate on the investment proposal. However they also warn that institutional investors are not just a “subsidising entity” and the Juncker Plan is best executed as a

Why Andrew Ang joined Blackrock

Andrew Ang believes factor investing is a more efficient way to organise a portfolio as it allows liquid and illiquid strategies to be managed across the portfolio. It also has the added benefit of honing managers on value creation. He’s been working with a handful of investors while Professor of Finance at Columbia University on

The power of engagement

It is called the “CalPERS’ Effect” but it could easily be called the asset owner effect, or the institutional investor effect, or the power of engagement effect. Wilshire, which is a consultant to the $300 billion Californian fund CalPERS, has provided an update on its study measuring the effect of engagement on a targeted list of companies called the Focus List.

Previous