SWFs return home after run of cross-border deals

Sovereign wealth funds (SWFs) piled a record $20 billion into foreign direct investment (FDI) transactions last year, continuing the big cross-border forays they began in 2005.



But FDI and cross-border M&A activity from SWFs collapsed at the beginning of 2009 as portfolios were hit by the market downturn, and funds received less revenue from home governments as global trade slowed and commodity prices declined.

The findings were published in the World Investment Report 2009 by the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCAD).

The surge of FDI by SWFs “bucked the downward trend in global FDI as a whole” during 2008, the report states.

In the past two decades, cross-border M&A activity from SWFs totalled $65 billion, of which $57 billion was invested in the past four years.

Sponsored Content

Nearly three quarters of this FDI was directed to developed countries, particularly the UK, US and Canada.

The investments were highly concentrated in the financial and business services industries, respectively accounting for 26 per cent and 15 per cent of cross-border M&A between during 1987 to 2008.

The biggest investments were made by the SWFs of the United Arab Emirates and Singapore’s Temasek.

But in 2008, SWFs favoured mining, quarrying and petroleum industries, paring back their allocations to financial services, which nevertheless remains the most heavily invested sector.

But the stockmarket meltdowns of 2008 caused big investment losses and depressed the pace of growth of FDI and cross-border M&A activities. With economies looking at recovery but still hurting from the financial crisis, SWFs are putting more money in their home markets “to support their banking industries, to boost expenditures by their firms and, in some cases, to avoid foreign takeovers of some domestic firms,” the UNCAD report states.

“A number of them are withdrawing their investments in anticipation of further reductions in the value of their investments, and some of them are re-routing their funds for use in their domestic economies to restore investor confidence,” it says.

Meanwhile, the report calculated that four major SWFs form the Gulf together lost about $350 billion in 2008, falling from $1.165 trillion to $1.115 trillion.

The Abu Dhabi Investment Authority shed $183 billion from the $453 billion it held in 2007. But the emirate pumped $57 billion into the fund, pushing its value to $329 billion.

The Kuwait Investment Authority lost $94 billion from its $262 billion, but the government primed it with $59 billion, lifting its funds under management to $228 billion.

The Qatar Investment Authority recorded a loss of $27 billion to land at $66 billion, while the Saudi Arabia Monetary Agency saw $46 billion vanish from its $501 billion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Big investors keep faith with hedge funds

Large investors with more than $1 billion allocated to hedge funds plan to maintain or increase their exposure in 2012, a Preqin study has found.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Divergent strategies have pride of place

About 20 per cent of an institutional investors’ hedge fund exposure should be allocated to “divergent” strategies, according to Rob Covino, senior vice president of SSARIS, which has been managing absolute return strategies for 30 years.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

CalSTRS boosts infrastructure exposure

The unique pension fund-owned structure of Industry Funds Management contributed to it winning a large infrastructure mandate from the $144.8 billion CalSTRS, whose risk-based view of the world has it looking for inflation-hedging diversification.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Climate risk disclosure project goes global

An original Australian pilot project to benchmark asset owners on their management of climate change risk will be expanded globally later in the year.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Should US investors have rights offshore?

US institutional investors are discouraged to diversify into offshore shares due to the outcome of a court case which restricts anti-fraud protection. The US case involving the purchase of shares in an Australian bank by Australian investors on an Australian stock exchange has important implications for US institutional investors and their drive to diversify investments

Alternatives the winner of long-term allocation shifts

Allocations to alternative investments of the largest seven pension markets globally (P7) have increased by 15 per cent over the past 16 years, according to Towers Watson. Carl Hess, Towers Watson’s global head of investment, says the study reflects two investment themes in the past few years: globalisation and diversification. While alternatives have increased as

Previous