Malaysian investments favour domestic, cross-border strategies

To combat
the financial crisis, Khazanah Nasional Berhard, the US$25.7 billion
investment arm of the Malaysian government, will focus on catalysing domestic
economic growth and continuing its program of strategic cross-border
investments.

Khazanah,
which is entrusted with managing the Malaysian government’s commercial assets
and undertaking strategic domestic and global investments, aims to stimulate
the Malaysian economy by focusing on domestic investments with “high economic
and job creation multipliers,” the public company said in a statement.

The
manager has stakes in more than 50 companies, including an array of ‘government-linked
companies’, which are involved in industries ranging from banking, power,
telecommunications, infrastructure, transport and venture capital.

In the
four years to 2008, Khazanah and its underlying companies injected
approximately RM36 billion (US$9.89 billion) into the Malaysian economy. For
the three years to 2011, it has allocated $15.94 billion to be invested domestically
in industries including telecommunications, infrastructure, health care and
tourism. It will also target sectors that it regards as “new engines of
growth”.

But this
domestic focus will not stall its cross-border investment activities and
ambitions to attract foreign direct investment into

Sponsored Content

Malaysia.

“Khazanah
will continue to strengthen regional investment linkages and selectively look
for two-way investment opportunities to bring in more foreign direct investment
as well as continuing to selectively regionalise,” the company said.

In the
course of 2008, the financial crisis diminished the returns from Khazanah’s
listed investments portfolio, resulting in a decline of 35.7 per cent for the
year.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous