LACERS alters allocations to hedge against inflation

The $9.3 billion Los Angeles City Employees Retirement System will tilt its asset allocation to hedge against inflation and will discuss altering its investment policy to explicitly address inflation at each annual asset allocation review.


Chief investment officer, Daniel Gallagher and staff at the consultant Pension Consulting Alliance recommended making changes to the fund’s asset allocation to specifically deal with the risk that inflation poses to the portfolio.

The creation of a factor-based real return asset class, including TIPS, commodities and timber, was discussed. However the fund decided to address inflation risk using the current portfolio asset class structure to add real-return type assets when appropriate in addressing inflation risk.

The proposed asset allocation changes from current targets consist of a reduction in domestic equities, and increases in fixed income and alternative investments.

The fund is also considering a revised real estate investment policy which includes changing the benchmark from the NCREIF Property Index Plus 200 basis points, to the NCREIF Property index.

The real estate portfolio continues to underperform with a return of -13.9 per cent for the quarter, compared to the benchmark of -5.2 per cent, and a return of -40.8 per cent for the year which is 21.2 per cent under the benchmark.

Sponsored Content

The alternatives portfolio is also an underperformer with a return of -17.4 per cent for the year, trailing the benchmark by 14.6 per cent.

The fund overall returned 11. 3 per cent for the quarter which was 1.3 per cent below the policy benchmark.

 

Asset allocation at September 2009

Asset class September % target %

US equity   39.3  42.0

Fixed income  25.3   22.0

Int equity  19.2  20.0

Real estate  4.9   7.0

Alternatives  8.7   8.0

Cash 2.6  1.0

Leave a Comment

More from this fund

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous