Jeff Scott takes on risky business as Wurts’ inaugural CIO

A common belief in the value of a risk-based approach to asset allocation, and a courtship of eight months, has culminated in Jeff Scott being appointed the first chief investment officer of US consulting firm, Wurts & Associates. Scott, (pictured) who as chief investment officer of the $39 billion Alaska Permanent Fund, has revitalised and reformed the sovereign wealth fund’s approach to asset allocation, predicated his move to Wurts on ensuring the completion of a number of projects at the APFC, including a five-year strategic plan.

Scott will join Wurts in August, charged with managing the $1.2 billion in discretionary investment solutions, and developing an asset allocation framework based on risk analysis.

Max Giolitti, APFC’s director of asset allocation and risk who has worked with Scott at various institutions since 1998, will also be joining Wurts as director of risk allocation.

“The more time I spent with Jeff MacLean over the past eight months the more I realised there are consulting firms that do think outside the box, that realise standard deviation does not equal risk, and that valuations matter,” Scott said. “Wurts has a strategist on the payroll who writes opinion pieces about valuations, that’s refreshing.”

Chief executive of Wurts & Associates, Jeff MacLean, was passionate about the benefits of a risk-based approach to asset allocation, and called the mean variance optimisation followed by most investors “flawed at its core”.

“How people are allocating assets today is flawed at its core. The problem and the reality is that those responsible for trillions of dollars are using mean variance optimisation as a method. If you don’t understand the embedded risks you are doomed for failure,” he said.

Sponsored Content

“Jeff Scott has been thinking about risks not assets, and breaking that down, for years. We are building a business on a long-term basis on what’s right for the customer and the right way to manage assets. There are not enough people in our business willing to stand up and say this is the right way to do it. The enlightened plan sponsors appreciate the risk-based approach and the value of asset allocation and I believe over time the whole market will move to this approach.”

MacLean said most investors acknowledged the degree to which return came from asset allocation but they spent less than 2 per cent on asset allocation.

The appointment was part of the firm’s plans to expand its discretionary business, providing customised solutions for funds which would turn over their assets to the firm, with the consulting fee a percentage of assets.

“The right way to supervise and manage institutional assets is through a discretionary approach, the wisdom of this approach will become obvious. Funds will look to outsource and we will hire and deploy alpha or beta based on a strategy to meet their liabilities. Our strategy is premised on the fact one size does not fit all,” MacLean said.

Scott said that while he was reluctant at first to move from the CIO position at Alaska, he believed the fund was now through “the critical phase”.

“We have a new governance policy, a new risk-based investment policy, automated comprehensive risk platforms which are produced by the finance team, and the external CIO program has been in place for 18 months. The impact of that has been profound, trustees love the program,” Scott said.

For the past four months, the board and executive team of APFC had been working on a five-year strategic plan, which Scott said was CIO agnostic, and which tackled among other things diversification and fees.

“The board is aware their asset allocation lacks diversification, we measured it in 10 ways, and we are working on that. I love this job, and working with the trustees, and I want to make sure this happens.”

 

To read a profile on the Alaska Permanent Fund detailing its risk-based approach to asset allocation click here

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

CFA to lead industry out of crisis

Protecting the pension system is one of six key themes at the centre of the CFA Institute’s Future of Finance initiative as it aims to empower the investment industry to take leadership in restoring trust. Speaking at the sixty-sixth annual CFA Institute conference in Singapore this week, president and chief executive of the CFA Institute,

Tail risk parity, V 1.0

Just when you thought you were safe, the next reiteration of risk parity has arrived. AllianceBernstein’s tail risk parity takes the concept of risk parity, reallocating assets uniformly according to risk, but it uses tail risk, not volatility, as the core measure. The concept of risk parity is a portfolio diversified according to risk, rather

Retirement: a cause worth working on

There are two things that drive the newly appointed global chief operating officer of State Street Global Advisors, Greg Ehret, in his bid to improve the client experience: the retirement business is a cause worth working on and the clients are the reason the business exists. Ehret was appointed to the new position at SSgA,

Pension funds, where banks no longer go?

There continues to be potential for pension capital appearing where bank lending no longer wants to go. Commentators in the UK and continental Europe have heightened expectations that pension funds will step in to help fill the continent’s bank financing gap. Societe Generale, for instance, recently predicted further “disintermediation” by investors sidestepping banks and looking

Building consensus for investment beliefs at CalPERS

An investment-beliefs workshop for the CalPERS board, held in April, revealed five areas, including active management, where the views of the board and staff lacked consensus. The contentious, or unsettled, topics for discussion were active management, private asset classes, sustainability (environmental, social and governance), investment performance targets and stakeholder considerations. At the board workshop, Janine

Behind PGGM’s ESG index

In 2010 PGGM conducted a study to see if it was possible to reduce the number of companies it invested in from 4000 to 400, based on its environmental, social and governance leanings, and still maintain it’s beta risk/return profile. The idea was that the €133-billion ($174-billion) fund would better know and understand what it

Previous