Investors win with new hedge fund fee model

Hermes BPK, the hedge fund-of-funds (HFoF)  provider majority-owned by Hermes Fund Managers (which itself is fully-owned by the UK’s largest pension fund, the BT Pension Scheme), has completed work on an innovative performance fee model which will allow investors to clawback any unearned performance fees.

The model, which partners Matteo Dante Peruccio and Mark Baker discussed with conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com in April last year, has been designed with the long-term alignment between investor and manager in mind, and it encourages investment managers to focus on managing the money, not gathering assets.

The new fee structure, which applies to the HFoF fees and not to the fees charged by underlying managers, is such that the fee in any one period is taken but the performance needs to be maintained for the manager to keep the fee.

If the performance is below the watermark over three years, then the client gets the fee back on the part of the performance they have not received. The model is administratively complex and required considerable cooperation by the fund’s adminsistrator, Northern Trust.

“We should be earning, not taking, our fees,” chief executive Perruccio said in April. “We deserve to get paid for what we do but we need to earn them, this has very positive repercussions in the way we manage money including transparency and alignment.”

Hermes BPK offers three hedge funds which attract a negotiable management fee that starts at 1.5 per cent, and a 10 per cent performance fee.

Sponsored Content

The £34 billion ($54 billion) BT Pension Scheme seeded the boutique, which is now one of 10 investment boutiques within the Hermes stable, with a $1.3 billion mandate. The three funds now have $1.6 billion under management collectively, including money from three external clients.

One response to “Investors win with new hedge fund fee model”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous