Investors win with new hedge fund fee model

Hermes BPK, the hedge fund-of-funds (HFoF)  provider majority-owned by Hermes Fund Managers (which itself is fully-owned by the UK’s largest pension fund, the BT Pension Scheme), has completed work on an innovative performance fee model which will allow investors to clawback any unearned performance fees.

The model, which partners Matteo Dante Peruccio and Mark Baker discussed with conexust1f.flywheelstaging.com in April last year, has been designed with the long-term alignment between investor and manager in mind, and it encourages investment managers to focus on managing the money, not gathering assets.

The new fee structure, which applies to the HFoF fees and not to the fees charged by underlying managers, is such that the fee in any one period is taken but the performance needs to be maintained for the manager to keep the fee.

If the performance is below the watermark over three years, then the client gets the fee back on the part of the performance they have not received. The model is administratively complex and required considerable cooperation by the fund’s adminsistrator, Northern Trust.

“We should be earning, not taking, our fees,” chief executive Perruccio said in April. “We deserve to get paid for what we do but we need to earn them, this has very positive repercussions in the way we manage money including transparency and alignment.”

Hermes BPK offers three hedge funds which attract a negotiable management fee that starts at 1.5 per cent, and a 10 per cent performance fee.

Sponsored Content

The £34 billion ($54 billion) BT Pension Scheme seeded the boutique, which is now one of 10 investment boutiques within the Hermes stable, with a $1.3 billion mandate. The three funds now have $1.6 billion under management collectively, including money from three external clients.

One response to “Investors win with new hedge fund fee model”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Investors x embrace ethics

More than half of the world’s largest sovereign wealth funds, and around a third of the largest US state pension funds, have a disclosed code of ethics for their staff. According to the Public Fund Investment Policies 2015 annual review produced by the Ohio State University Moritz College of Law, a code of ethics helps

Shared fund objectives key to investor success

The practice of benchmarking the salaries of senior executives of institutional funds with reference to external financial services firms, instead of the shared objectives of the fund, is a major barrier to their success, according to Professor Gordon Clark of Oxford University and director of Smith School of Enterprise and the Environment. Clark sees the

PGGM halves CO2 footprint in investments

Ahead of the COP21 in Paris, the second largest Dutch fund with €161 billion ($160 billion), Pensioenfonds Zorg en Welzijn (PFZW), has announced it will halve the CO2 footprint of its investments by 2020. After an in-depth study with its fund manager, PGGM, the fund has decided its capital should be focused on companies that

Mercer’s seven tools for risk management reflect evolving landscape

Mercer Investments is using its deep insurance and environmental, social and governance (ESG) skills, contacts and processes to evolve its tools for advising clients on investment risk assessment, analysis and reporting – a move that reflects the evolving landscape for risk faced by investors. Partner and global head of responsible investment at Mercer, Jane Ambachtsheer,

OTPP advises on climate risk mitigation

Ontario Teachers’ Pension Plan (OTPP), an investor known for its advanced risk-management tools and processes, considers that the common tools available to investors to mitigate carbon risk for investors – portfolio carbon footprints and thematic divestment – provide incomplete risk management. The fund has suggested macro- and microanalysis is necessary to understand a company’s complete

PRI to consider new principle focusing on systemic risks

The UN-backed Principles for Responsible Investment (PRI) is considering a seventh principle that will focus on broad financial system systemic risks. The six principles were written before the global financial crisis and are focused on environmental, social and governance (ESG) integration. Now, a decade after their creation, consideration of systemic risks is on the agenda and

Previous