Harvard endowment hones managers

Harvard Management Company will increase manager concentration levels, look closely at commodities and real estate, and bring more assets in-house where appropriate, as it moves into fiscal year 2011 with an unchanged long-term asset allocation.President and chief executive of the Harvard Management Company, Jane Mendillo, said risk allocations have been increased in areas where HMC had good long-term experience and competitive strength.

“Internal fixed-income trading and natural resources for example, we have been increasing risk allocations and encouraging our teams to do more when they see good opportunities. We are increasingly confident that we can develop an edge in real estate and commodities, taking a few pages from the books we’ve developed around timberland investing and internal trading,” she said.

In the September endowment report, she also said, HMC intends to continue to reduce uncalled capital commitments to real estate and private equity fund managers, with uncalled capital commitments at the end of fiscal year 2010 sitting at about $6.5 billion, down from over $11 billion two years ago.

Over a 20-year period, private equity has been the best performing asset class for HMC, with a return of 19 per cent, compared with the benchmark of 14 per cent.

While Mendillo said Harvard has benefited from early participation in the private equity arena, it had become crowded – with capital, managers and investors – in the past decade.

“Our expectations for this asset class are that returns will be more muted going forward, and we are even more committed to holding our fire for the best-in-class opportunities,” she said.

Sponsored Content

While Harvard will continue to have a “meaningful level of exposure”, it is anticipated the number of active relationships within private equity and venture capital portfolio will be reduced, and the concentration will be increased in the highest conviction managers.

Across the entire portfolio Harvard has been increasing its concentration levels with the number of relationships decreasing by about 20 per cent in the past couple of years.

“We focus on partnering with the best of the best and improving the terms under which we operate together, moving toward greater access to our capital and more reasonable fees,” she said.

Investment management of the $27.4 billion endowment is overseen by Stephen Blythe, head of internal management, and Andy Wilthsire, head of external management.

Mendillo said they have collaborated on several joint investigations this year, including an improved active commodities strategy, to be implemented in fiscal 2011.

Mendillo and the university have continue to defend the “endowment model” but have been working to enhance it, through further risk and liquidity management analysis, and a closer working relationship which aims to better align the endowment’s risk/return profile with the university’s goals and needs.

In the last fiscal year 2010, the HMC also engaged a consulting firm to assess its cost structure in managing the endowment, comparing it to a group of asset managers to identify areas of best practice and opportunities for improvement.

The study concluded that over the past five years, HMC’s total operating costs as a percentage of assets under management have averaged less than 0.3 per cent, including variable compensation.

“The study assessed that the HMC’s operating cost structure as significantly less than the cost of equivalent external or outsourced management.”

Mendillo says this has saved Harvard more than $1 billion in management fees over the past decade.

To the year ended June 30, the endowment portfolio earned an investment return of 11 per cent, 160 basis points above the policy portfolio benchmark.

Harvard endowment long-term policy portfolio

1995 2005 2010*
domestic equities 38% 15% 11%
foreign equities 15 10 11
emerging markets 5 5 11
private equities 12 13 13
Total equity 70 43 46
absolute return 0 12 16
commodities 6 13 14
real estate 7 10 9
total real assets 13 23 23
domestic bonds 15 11 4
foreign bonds 5 5 2
high yield 2 5 2
inflation-indexed bonds 0 6 5
total fixed income 22 27 13
cash -5 -5 2
total 100 100 100

*unchanged for fiscal 2011

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Australian contributions increase shifts retirement burden

The increase in the Australian superannuation guarantee (SG) from 9 to 12 per cent of salary is an example of how the retirement savings burden, a global phenomenon, can be shifted from the public to private sectors, according to senior partner at Mercer, David Knox. The increase in the SG, which has been approved in

Why you should take notice of what we write

New research released this month gives impetus to the evidence that newspaper articles can predict aggregate future stock returns. Conducted by Professor of Finance at the University of St Gallen in Switzerland, Manuel Ammann, it examines articles in the German finance paper, Handeslblatt, from July 1989 until March 2011, and overall found that “newspaper content

CalPERS to move $1bn fixed income in-house

CalPERS plans to move $1 billion of its externally-managed international fixed income portfolio in-house in the next 12 months, but it will require board approval to do so.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Texas Teachers extends manager partnerships

Texas Teachers Retirement System has extended a unique public markets strategic partnership structure to two of its private market managers in a move it claims will give the fund a long-term strategic advantage over other investors.mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Keynes and the character required for a long-term view

In the interests of educating myself I recently read Chapter 12 “The State of Long-Term Expectations” in John Maynard Keynes’ seminal economics tome General Theory. I particularly like his statement: “it needs more intelligence to defeat the forces of time and our ignorance of the future than to beat the gun”, but then I’ve always

Recipe for avoiding half-baked dynamic asset allocation

In what is lauded as somewhat of a Laurel and Hardy performance, APG’s Stefan Lundbergh and academic provocateur Jack Gray, demonstrate the disparity between ideology and action in a hypothetical dynamic asset allocation case study. But jokes aside, it highlights the misnomer in the words “best practice”, and the lack of courage in this industry.

Previous