France’s FFR halves equities, weights bonds

Equities allocations have been slashed as a result of government changes to the liabilities of the Fonds de Reserve pour les Retraites (FFR) which prompted changes to the fund’s investment policy.

The new portfolio, approved in December 2010, more than halved the allocation to equities from 45 per cent to 21 per cent. It substantially increased allocations to bonds from 45 per cent to 73.9 per cent while commodities and real estate were both decreased from 5 per cent to 3.5 per cent and 1.8 per cent respectively.

This new portfolio was adopted in the belief that it would satisfy FRR’s liabilities which now entail 14 annual payments of €2.1 billion ($2.9 billion) to the Caisee d’Amotissement de la Dette Sociale (national social debt amortisation fund – CADES).

The fund – which totalled $51.6 billion at the end of last year – was created to meet the challenges of funding the mandatory retirement PAYGO plans.

As well as meeting the FRR’s liabilities, the changes to the strategic allocation are expected to provide an expected annualised return of 6 per cent, a decrease from the expected 6.3 per cent outlined in the 2009 policy.

It will be seen this year if the FRR is successful in its purpose of propping the French pension system up, with its annual payments to CADES commencing. The payments must be made each year by October until 2018, as outlined by a government set timetable, and will help CADES finance the deficits of the bodies which run the basic old age pension.

Sponsored Content

The breakdown of the new portfolio is as follows:

–          Commodities: 3.5 per cent

–          Real estate: 1.8 per cent

–          Emerging countries debt: 5.3 per cent

–          High yield debt: 3.5 per cent

–          Equities (including private equity): 21.0 per cent

–          Corporate bonds (Inv. Grade): 16.3 per cent

–          OECD Sovereign Bonds: 16.3 per cent

–          Cashflow-matched French Treasury Bonds (OAT): 32.5 per cent

One response to “France’s FFR halves equities, weights bonds”

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Is the financial services sector serving the public interest?

Fiduciary law, which creates the boundaries and rules for asset owners managing other people’s money, is evolving. The short-termism, misaligned incentives and complex and over-supply of services that characterises financial services, is under fire. Regulators around the world are increasingly looking at how to change the behaviour and supply chain dynamics in the industry, and

The impact of the mega manager

The impact of size is a delicate point for asset managers. For specialist asset classes, and boutique managers, being small and nimble can be a source of alpha. On the other hand, being large can reduce fees and increase innovation and product offering. But now there is evidence to show that the emergence of the

The contested role of asset consultants

Asset consultants are a key part of the investment chain, providing small funds with services that include decision making processes and strategic asset allocation, and for larger funds traditionally playing a key role in manager and strategy selection. But a study by Gordon Clark and Ashby Monk, which is part of a broader look by

Demystifying private equity

US public pension funds, on average, have around 9.4 per cent allocated to private equity but for many public funds monitoring the firms that manage these investments – including the transparency of underlying investments, fees, performance and benchmarking – as well justifying these investments to boards and stakeholders, takes up more than 10 per cent

Why investors employ smart beta strategies

The common view is smart beta is used to side step expensive active equity managers or hedge fund managers whose processes are on the surface opaque, but on close investigation turn out to be largely beta like in approach. As investors have gained experience and familiarity they have also learnt about how it offers greater

Managing culture with risk management techniques

The interaction between governance, culture and performance is increasingly a topic around asset owner board tables. But little has been written about the relationship between culture and the financial crisis, and how to change culture in financial services organisations. Andrew Lo, professor of finance at MIT, has come up with a proposal to change culture

Previous