Endowment funds turn to alternatives

Foundation and endowment funds are allocating the largest percentage of alternatives to their portfolios, with public funds coming second ahead corporate plans in third place.

During the past five years, foundation and endowment funds’ allocations to alternatives rose from 16 per cent in 2005 to 35 per cent in 2010.

According to Callan Associates’ 2010 Alternative Investments Survey, fund sponsors’ allocations to alternatives nearly doubled from 11 per cent in 2005 to 20 per cent in 2010 as they sought greater portfolio diversification and enhanced returns, and that percentage was expected to rise to 24 per cent by 2012.

Jamie Shen (pictured), practice leader, alternative investments consulting for Callan Associates, said the four main deterrents to investing in alternatives were liquidity, cost/pricing and fees, policy and board-level matters and transparency.

Other deterrents included risk (such as asymmetric, headline and political risks), the required use of excess leverage, returns, fund size and regulations.

Funds investing in alternatives generally required some degree of additional support and resources to select, manage and monitor alternative investments, said Shen.

Sponsored Content

More than 60 per cent of survey respondents used an external consultant or advisor, with public funds ranking the highest at 73 per cent, and about 50 per cent for endowment, foundation and corporate funds.

Smaller plans with less than $1 billion in assets generally did not use an external consultant.

Shen said the progressive shift to alternatives – with inflows coming primarily from domestic equities – could be attributed to equities performance challenges over the past 10 years.

The average domestic equity target allocation had dropped 12 per cent between 2005 and 2010 and was expected to fall another 6 per cent by 2012.

The survey delves deeply into real estate, private equity and hedge fund trends and broadly covers commodities, infrastructure, portable alpha, socially responsible investments, timberland, TIPS, and agriculture.

Real estate was most commonly used alternative by survey respondents (80 per cent), followed by private equity (69 per cent) and hedge funds (52 per cent).

Hedge funds garnered the largest average allocation – about 10 per cent – followed by private equity (8 per cent) and real estate at about 7 per cent.

Callan’s survey also examined secondary market usage of the three main alternative asset classes: real estate, hedge funds and private equity.

Private equity was the most active secondary market, with nearly 40 per cent participating as buyers and 7 per cent as sellers, while real estate and hedge fund secondary markets received little interest from investors.

All reported secondary market purchases occurred after 2003 with 50 per cent taking place in 2009 and 2010.

The survey was done in the third quarter of 2010, and of the 67 organisations surveyed, most – 88 per cent – had current allocations to alternative assets.

Public funds represented 42 per cent of respondents, with corporate funds at 31 per cent and foundation and endowment funds at 24 per cent.

More than 28 per cent of respondents had more than $5 billion in assets under management, 28 per cent had between $1 billion and $5 billion and about 42 per cent had less than $1 billion.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The cost of bad asset allocation

A study of 300 US pension funds by CEM Benchmarking reinforces the importance of asset allocation, highlighting the performance of asset classes, as well as new evidence on correlations between asset classes. Alex Beath, author of the study, discusses the implications for asset allocation with Amanda White. A CEM Benchmarking study “Asset Allocation and Fund

The OECD’s plan for long-term investment

G20 financial ministers and central bank governors welcomed the findings of the G20/OECD roundtable on institutional investors and long-term investment last month, which included clear plans to incentivise institutional investors to undertake more long-term investments. The roundtable, “From solutions to actions: implementing measures to encourage institutional long-term investment financing”, held in Singapore recognised that long-term

Why long-horizon investors should adopt factor-based asset allocation

Long-horizon investors can withstand macro-economic volatility and so should tilt towards strategies that are exposed to that, including value, small cap and momentum. Oleg Ruban, vice president in the applied research team at MSCI says this validates factor-investing and factor-based asset allocation for these investors.   Appropriate asset allocation requires explicit attention be paid to

The case for long-termism

Keith Ambachtsheer’s lead article in the Fall 2014 edition of the Rotman International Journal of Pension Management, takes readers through an historical and logical journey that supports the case for long-termism. Importantly he validates this with four high-profile investor case studies which demonstrate that a long-term view benefits society but also the investors, willing to

Investors alter allocations because of climate risks

A number of large institutional investors, including AP1, the Environment Agency and AustralianSuper, made changes to their strategic asset allocation as a result of Mercer’s 2011 study on climate risks, and now the consultant is working with a new raft of investors to assess forward-looking climate change scenarios against their current allocations. Meanwhile one of

Real estate sector continues to lead on sustainability: GRESB

This year’s Global Real Estate Sustainability Benchmark (GRESB) reveals that sustainability reporting has improved in coverage and quality of data, with the average overall score increasing due to increasing implementation and measurement. The average score is now 47 (out of 100) which is up nine points this year. The benchmark collects data from 637 listed

Previous