Corporate US plans expect too much

US corporate defined-benefit plans are still severely underfunded, with an artificially high return expectation contributing to the situation, according to a report of the funding status of 308 US corporate defined benefit plans by Wilshire Consulting.

While the funding status of the funds has increased in the past year, from 80.2 to 83.4 per cent, more than 90 of the corporate pension plans remain underfunded.

The slight improvement was due to a vast improvement in pension fund performance, with the median 2009 investment return of 16.2 per cent representing a stark rebound from the -27.4 per cent median return of 2008.

The survey measured the funding status, and investment profile, of 308 companies in the S&P500 index that maintain defined benefit plans. In the year the combined assets increased from $883 billion to $992.9 billion, while the liabilities increased from $1,101.5 billion to $1,191.2 billion.

Although the median expected return on plan assets’ assumptions has fallen during the past nine years, from 9.5 per cent in 2000 to 8 per cent in 2009, the report quotes that many pension accounting critics believe this assumption is still too high.

Sponsored Content

Wilshire Consulting’s long-term forecast for the return on corporate pension plans is will below this, at about 6.4 per cent, based on the average asset allocation of the corporate pension plans.

The average asset allocation of these plans was: 54.1 per cent in total equities; 34 per cent in total fixed income; 1.7 per cent in real estate; 1.4 per cent in private equity; 0.8 per cent in hedge funds; and 8 per cent in other including cash.

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

Breaking bad habits: why investors aren’t good at asset allocation

Institutional investors act like momentum investors, chasing returns, even over longer time horizons according to Asset Allocation and Bad Habits, a new research paper that looks at the impact of past returns on asset allocation. The paper commissioned by Rotman-ICPM and authored by Amit Goyal professor at Univeriste de Lausanne, Andrew Ang professor at Columbia Business

Is in-house management the future for large asset owners?

The allure of potentially higher net returns from portfolios precisely tailored to values, beliefs and risk appetite is hard for any asset owner to ignore, yet needs to be balanced against the many challenges associated with managing assets in-house. To this end, it is worth outlining the key benefits that in-house asset management can offer.

Addressing shortcomings in current corporate reporting

Investors don’t have access to all the information they need today. Raj Thamotheram, Mark Van Clieaf and Alan Willis ask: why aren’t investors (and their clients) demanding it? Without relevant, timely and reliable information, investors are unable to make informed long-term investment decisions. The efficiency of capital markets in allocating invested funds – the only real value of

To invest in China today you must be at the head of the kewfie

Regulatory proposals announced in April mean that in October foreign investors will be able to buy the top shares listed on the Chinese mainland stock exchange within annual quota limits. The momentum of market liberalisation is such that MSCI is considering using such A shares in its emerging market indices, a move that will take Chinese

Chinese SWFs need co-investors

China’s biggest sovereign wealth funds need, and want, co-investment opportunities in real assets and private equity and are open to new partnerships with international investors of the right credentials, and the longer term the partnership the better. This is the feedback of Michael Wadley, a specialist lawyer of Australian origin based in Shanghai, who runs

Foundations and endowments flock to long duration

The risk of a US equity market decline and concerns over the future direction of interest rates has been driving US foundations and endowments’ asset allocation decisions in the past year, with a distinct move away from US equity to global allocations and away from US-focused core to longer duration and high yield. The latest

Previous