Time to mend relationships in investment management

A new KPMG report, ‘Renewing the promise: Time to mend relationships in investment management”, shows the investment management industry should work to rebuild trust with investors through a ‘back-to-basics’ client relationship approach, increase knowledge sharing, and bolster corporate
governance and risk management transparency.

KPMG International commissioned Datamonitor to undertake the research which was launched at Fund Forum International in Monaco.

Overall, the results show that better communication holds the key to future success. These lines of communication should flow not only from investment managers to their clients, but also, crucially, from investment managers to intermediaries and to regulators, as they will play a fundamental role in repairing the trust that has been broken.

This message of the need for more effective communication manifests itself in a variety of ways, including calls by investors and intermediaries for additional training and transparency on product and strategy, for explicit vocalisation by investment managers of their adherence to an industry best practice code of conduct and for more direct, face-to-face time with managers.

In terms of the breakdown in trust, the research highlighted that financial intermediaries – client-facing advisors – in particular, are perceived as being untrustworthy and lacking knowledge, perhaps as a result of poor education by investment managers on complex products and risk management practices.

Sponsored Content

In fact, 77 per cent of investors overall felt that intermediaries are less trustworthy than politicians.

To combat this, 58 per cent of institutional investors believe that investment managers should provide financial intermediaries with better product training in order to help them regain client trust, a sentiment matched by 75 per cent of investment managers themselves.

Responding to the research, Tom Brown, partner and EMA Region of Investment Management, KPMG in the UK, said: “At this time of market turbulence and broken trust, the investment management industry should adapt and change to re-engage investors. Open communication amongst all market participants is particularly critical, and investment managers and intermediaries must forge collaborative, knowledge-based partnerships, focused solely on the client. Only by implementing a joined-up approach, supported by better corporate governance and risk management, can the needs of the investor truly be met.”

Notably, the research showed that managers do not have faith in their own senior-level management being able to drive this necessary change, especially with regards to risk management and corporate governance procedures:
65 per cent of investment managers globally cited lack of vision by top management as the major obstacle to change, leaping to a staggering 90 per cent of managers questioned in the US.

A lack of vision at the top is not the only obstacle to change and progress, however. The report also showed that the inevitable cascade of regulatory change is likely to significantly hamper the industry, with 81 per cent of respondents believing more regulation will remove opportunities for innovation going forward.

There are also significant concerns regarding the cost impact of a new regulatory regime; 72 per cent of participants feel that a regulatory clampdown will seriously increase costs for investment managers, and 63 per cent think investment managers will not be able to pass on these associated costs to their clients.

Commenting on regulation, James Suglia, global head of Investment Management Advisory, KPMG in the US, said: “The investment management sector is braced for regulatory change, and is ready to learn its lessons from the financial crisis. More than ever, the “time is now” for true engagement between the industry and the regulators to shape the future of the investment management landscape. Regulation has the potential to deliver a new lease of life through market stabilisation, information sharing and product transparency, but only by taking a consultative approach can the correct results be achieved.”

Not everyone is agreed on where this regulation will fall though. For example, 53 per cent of institutional investors believe that risk management and internal controls will be more strictly regulated in the future, whilst investment managers feel the focus will be on leverage limitations (77 per cent).

David Seymour, partner and global head of Investment Management, KPMG in the US, concluded: “Events of the past year have once again put the issue of trust into sharp relief, and it is fair to say that the credibility and reputation of the investment sector has been damaged. It is little wonder that investors, faced with the realities of plummeting stock markets and portfolios, have questioned the integrity of the investment management industry. This research clearly
shows that constituent parties in the investment chain are not communicating with each other to best effect. The industry should find ways to open these lines of communication once more, and by doing so, rebuild the trust of
investors.”

Click here to download the report.

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Persistently high equity risk premium unprecedented

This paper by the Federal Reserve Bank of New York looks at the equity risk premium information from 20 models and estimates the ERP for various time periods. Extraordinarily it finds that the (preferred) estimator places the one-year equity premium in July 2013 at 14.5 percent, the highest level in 50 years and well above the

Investor pitfalls in setting up a satellite office

As part of the broader trend to become professional organisations, pension funds and soverieng wealth funds are expanding geographically with the establishment of satellite offices. This expansion raises concerns of governance, culture, politics and talent. This paper looks at the case studies from 12 funds that have launched or considering launching satellite offices and offers

The Determinants of Pension Funds’ Allocation to Private Equity

This paper by the French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS) investigates the main determinants of pension funds investment in private equity funds, and particularly in venture capital and leverage buyouts in the US and Canada over the 1996-2011 period. The results show some important differences between pension funds allocating to private equity and more traditional assets. The first ones are

Recasting private equity after the financial crisis

This article published by the European Corporate Governance and written by Tilburg University academics examines the post-financial crisis trends in the private equity industry, showing investors are demanding the inclusion of more investor-favorable compensation terms in limited partnership agreements. The findings suggest these new terms not only provide the investors with more favorable management fee and profit

Systemic tail risk

A research paper by executives at the Dutch Central Bank, De Nederlandsche Bank, examines tail risk, and shows that historical tail betas are able to capture the sensitivity to future systematic tail risk.   The paper can be downloaded here  Systemic tail riskmrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Is Bitcoin a real currency?

Analysis of Bitcoin’s historical trading behaviour shows it has exchange rate volatility an order of magnitude higher than the volatilities of widely used currencies, undermining its usefulness as a unit of account or a store of value. Bitcoin’s daily exchange rates exhibit virtually zero correlation with bona fide currencies, making it useless for risk management

Previous