Benchmarking infrastructure a step closer

The first valuation and risk measurement model created for unlisted infrastructure debt has been developed, with the release of a paper showing the valuation of illiquid infrastructure project debt, taking into account its illiquidity and the absence of market price feedback, can be done using advanced, state-of-the-art structural credit risk modelling.

The paper by EDHEC-Risk Institute is part of an ongoing research project aiming to create long-term investment benchmarks for investments in infrastructure.

EDHEC has previously said that improving investors’ access to infrastructure requires the creation of new performance measurement tools that can inform the asset allocation decisions of investors in infrastructure and help them integrate assets like infrastructure debt into their respective risk and return frameworks.

The paper proposes to address the challenges of illiquid investment performance measurement including the information scarcity of illiquid investments. Without market prices or large cash flow datasets, performance measurement is not straightforward. At the moment there is an absence of relevant performance measures.

This latest paper focuses on private project finance loans, as EDHEC says they constitute the largest proportion, by far, of illiquid infrastructure project debt, and are well-defined since Basel II.

The paper looks at the appropriate pricing models, return and risk models and defines minimum data collection requirements.

Sponsored Content

EDHEC shows that the valuation of illiquid infrastructure project debt, taking into account its illiquidity and the absence of market price feedback, can be done using advanced, state-of-the-art structural credit risk modelling, relying on a parsimonious set of empirical inputs.

Further, the data required to evaluate the performance of illiquid infrastructure project debt can provide the basis for a reporting standard for long-term investors.

Research director at EDHEC-Risk Institute in Singapore, Frederic Blanc-Brude said the model  is practical and useful, for example it predicts the probability of default in infrastructure project debt as reported by Moody’s even before calibration with actual defaults or cash flow data.

Blanc-Brude said in the coming months, EDHEC will continue to implement its roadmap to create infrastructure debt investment benchmarks, which includes data collection to document and calibrate cash flow volatility and the creation of a reporting standard, which is effectively covered by the data collection requirements identified in the paper.

 

The paper can be accessed below

Unlisted infrastructure debt valuation and performance measurement

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Measuring manager performance expectations

Institutional investors do not act on their own expectations when choosing fund managers, rather their reliance on consultants, and past performance, exacerbates the agency problem in the institutional investment supply chain a new study from Oxford University shows. Using survey data for 1999-2011 the academics analyse the views of plan sponsors on their asset managers,

The predictive power of portfolio characteristics

Investors still rely, to a great extent, on past performance to assess managers’ future performance. Rather than rely on past performance outcomes to predict future results, a new paper, The predictive power of portfolio characteristics, argues that it is possible to improve the ability to predict future long-term success by identifying and measuring selected portfolio characteristics

Pension fund governance needs an overhaul, still

How much has pension fund governance changed in the past 16 years? Not much! A survey of pension fund governance by Keith Ambachtsheer and John McLaughlin, which asked respondents the same questions in 1997, 2005 and 2014 reveal that the same “sources of excellence shortfall” exist today as they did 16 years ago. Pension fund

Fees eat diversification’s lunch

The balance between the allocating to the right number of asset classes and over-diversification is a concern for pension fund investment executives and committees. A new paper by professors at the US Air Force Academy examines the relationship between fees of diversifying asset classes and their diversifying benefits. The paper finds that, in many cases,

Optimal long-term allocation with pension fund liabilities

The literature on how to optimally manage the investments of defined contribution funds is relatively scarce, despite the fact the growth in defined contribution continues to outpace defined benefit funds globally. Now new research from academics at the University of Lausanne demonstrates how to perform an ALM study from a financial prospective for defined contribution

The real factor exposures in “smart beta” indexes

Investors relying on nomenclature of smart beta indexes as an accurate reflection of their factor exposures should take a closer look. New research, using a “factor efficiency ratio”, finds that most smart beta indexes are unable to provide desired factor exposures without taking on substantial unintended exposures. Importantly the paper finds that some smart beta

Previous