Benchmarking infrastructure a step closer

The first valuation and risk measurement model created for unlisted infrastructure debt has been developed, with the release of a paper showing the valuation of illiquid infrastructure project debt, taking into account its illiquidity and the absence of market price feedback, can be done using advanced, state-of-the-art structural credit risk modelling.

The paper by EDHEC-Risk Institute is part of an ongoing research project aiming to create long-term investment benchmarks for investments in infrastructure.

EDHEC has previously said that improving investors’ access to infrastructure requires the creation of new performance measurement tools that can inform the asset allocation decisions of investors in infrastructure and help them integrate assets like infrastructure debt into their respective risk and return frameworks.

The paper proposes to address the challenges of illiquid investment performance measurement including the information scarcity of illiquid investments. Without market prices or large cash flow datasets, performance measurement is not straightforward. At the moment there is an absence of relevant performance measures.

This latest paper focuses on private project finance loans, as EDHEC says they constitute the largest proportion, by far, of illiquid infrastructure project debt, and are well-defined since Basel II.

The paper looks at the appropriate pricing models, return and risk models and defines minimum data collection requirements.

Sponsored Content

EDHEC shows that the valuation of illiquid infrastructure project debt, taking into account its illiquidity and the absence of market price feedback, can be done using advanced, state-of-the-art structural credit risk modelling, relying on a parsimonious set of empirical inputs.

Further, the data required to evaluate the performance of illiquid infrastructure project debt can provide the basis for a reporting standard for long-term investors.

Research director at EDHEC-Risk Institute in Singapore, Frederic Blanc-Brude said the model  is practical and useful, for example it predicts the probability of default in infrastructure project debt as reported by Moody’s even before calibration with actual defaults or cash flow data.

Blanc-Brude said in the coming months, EDHEC will continue to implement its roadmap to create infrastructure debt investment benchmarks, which includes data collection to document and calibrate cash flow volatility and the creation of a reporting standard, which is effectively covered by the data collection requirements identified in the paper.

 

The paper can be accessed below

Unlisted infrastructure debt valuation and performance measurement

 

Leave a Comment

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

GIC, Temasek eye trillions of growth in climate adaptation market

Singapore’s two largest asset owners, GIC and Temasek, see attractive opportunities in climate adaptation solutions – a relatively underfunded area compared to decarbonisation. The former has already made selective adaptation investments and said the opportunity set across public and private debt and equity could increase to $9 trillion by 2050.

Sort content by

Happy workers make investors happy too

Good companies to work for are also good companies to invest in, according to new research by Alex Edman of the Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania. In a recent paper, Edmans says there is a direct positive correlation over the long term between employee satisfaction and stock market returns for the companies they work for.

The Fraying U.S. – China Co-Dependency

After many years of extraordinary growth, China has clearly been adversely affected by the global economic recession. Its own economy is slowing rapidly, with declines in exports, property prices, and fixed investment. In response, the Chinese government. strongly motivated to maintain stability, is injecting large doses of fiscal stimulus and making other administrative efforts to

Black Monday and Black Swans

Investors need to be aware that rare events with an extreme impact that, afterwards, we think we could have predicted – in short, black swans – happen in the markets. Those who are trying to measure risk in the financial markets need to carefully distinguish risk, with its probabilities, from uncertainty, which cannot be measured.

Why Fundamental Indexation Might – or Might Not – Work

Some proponents of fundamental indexation claim that the strategy is based on a new theory in which market prices of stocks deviate from fair values. A key assumption in this approach is that fundamental weights are unbiased estimators of fair value weights that are statistically independent of market values. This article demonstrates that, except in

Best ideas exist, so why do managers include underperformers?

Randy Cohen from Harvard Business School, Christopher Polk from the London School of Economics, and Bernhard Silli from the Universitat Pompeu Fabra and the London School of Economics, provide powerful evidence that mutual fund managers can pick stocks that outperform the market. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored Content scnative1 scnative2 scnative3

Model, hypothetical, and backtested performance – best practices

In the CFA Institute’s new Investment Performance Measurement newsletter, launched this month David Spaulding, president The Spaulding Group, and Steven Stone, partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius discuss the issues concerning the use of theoretical performance, summarise the regulatory implications and risks of using such presentations, and suggest best practices and appropriate disclosures. mrec4inarticleinline Sponsored

Previous