Australian royal commission final report

Australia’s superannuation trustees will be forced to lift their game, their roles will be restricted to avoid conflict and they will be hit with civil penalties for failing to act in the best interests of members.

The much-awaited final report for the Royal Commission into Misconduct in the Banking, Superannuation and Financial Services Industry  was released publicly on Monday afternoon.

Australia’s superannuation assets totalled A$2.8 trillion at the end of September 2018 and is the fourth biggest market for pension assets globally (after the US, UK and Japan).The royal commission, which kicked off in March and ran across 68 days of hearings and more than 10,000 public submissions, looked into bad practices in the superannuation, banking and insurance sectors.

The final report, by Commissioner Kenneth Hayne, made three key recommendations aimed at elevating the role of superannuation trustees. Hayne made 10 recommendations relating to financial advice and seven relating to superannuation.

Trustees should be prohibited from “assuming any obligations other than those” related to being the trustee of the fund, and be banned from “treating” employers in order to have their fund nominated as a default fund under a new civil penalty provision.

Further, the Hayne Commission also recommended trustees should be prohibited from hawking super products, should not be allowed to deduct advice fees from a MySuper account and should be limited from deducting fees from Choice accounts.

Sponsored Content

Importantly, the Commission has also recommended the banking executive accountability regime (BEAR), which governs who is responsible when issues arise, should be applied to the superannuation industry.

In the 951-page report publicly released on Monday afternoon, Hayne made 76 recommendations and highlighted 19 instances of potential misconduct through 22 entities. He referred 24 companies to regulators for possible criminal or civil action- the companies include National Australia Bank, AMP, IOOF, the Commonwealth Bank  and ANZ. In line with the interim report issued in September last year, it was scathing of regulators APRA and ASIC.

The federal government made its pledge to “act” on all the recommendations, despite it voting against a royal commission into the financial services sector 26 times. An Australian federal election will likely occur in May next year, and the opposition Labor party also supports the recommendations.

With regard to financial advice offerings Hayne recommended that opt-in periods become annual, with more focus on the specific services to be provided. This will dramatically change the ongoing service agreements that underpin most advice remuneration models in Australia.

“The central changes I would make are to require that ongoing fee arrangements must be renewed annually and that the client be told what will be done,” he stated in the final report, delivered Monday.

For background click here and for more on the royal commission visit Investment Magazine.

Leave a Comment

Why traditional investment committees can amplify group biases

Why traditional investment committees can amplify group biases

Investment committee meetings, a governance cornerstone at every asset owner organisation, run the risk of amplifying group biases and social dynamics, and can push the IC towards recommending more extreme investment positions collectively than the average of their individual views. Bernhard Scherer, head of portfolio implementation at ADIA, unpacks the thesis in a new paper.

Sort content by

How UK’s LGPS still has a long way to go creating a Canadian model

The UK’s new Chancellor of the Exchequer Rachel Reeves just returned from a trip to Toronto where was gleaning ideas from Maple 8 bosses on how to emulate a “Canadian style” pension model. But it will require a governance overhaul to create a Maple 8 in the UK.

NBIM transparently explains half year results

The semi annual report of Norway’s sovereign wealth fund is testament to its commitment to transparency, unambiguously outlining the half year results which came in 0.04% under benchmark. The fund did benefit from a nearly 15% exposure to tech stocks, but was let down by returns in renewable energy infrastructure.

AP funds face consolidation as report flags scale and efficiency wins

A long-awaited review into Sweden's buffer funds suggests consolidation between the three Stockholm funds – AP1, AP3 and AP4 – stating that the advantages in terms of efficiency and scale outweigh the disadvantages of continued separation.

Same same, but different: Governance lessons from three markets

Despite global pension markets’ varying levels of maturity, the goal of combining portfolio resilience with meeting fund objectives is the same, and it can be achieved through different manifestations of governance structures.

Solid foundations allow Canadian funds to innovate and grow

The foundations of the modern Canadian pension fund industry were laid decades ago, and organisations today continue to reap the benefits. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Toronto heard that the potential of the industry is immense, built on solid principles and an embrace of new technology and processes.

Pioneers of the Canadian model say its principles are under siege

A founding principle of the Canadian pension system is under attack. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium in Toronto heard from four individuals who have been instrumental in making the system what it is today, and that the sound principles that made the system great need to be defended.

Previous