Changing priorities for infrastructure investors

Investors discuss how technological change and the new green economy is re-pricing assets in infrastructure, as well as the trend to substitute fixed income with infrastructure debt. But investors should not to lose sight of traditional infrastructure characteristics in their quest to tap new trends. Predictable cashflows and downside protection remain central. 

Speaking at FIS Digital 2021 in an expert panel on infrastructure investment, US firm Cohen & Steers’ head of global infrastructure Ben Morton explained how the firm focuses on investing in companies that “collect fees.” He added that the firm buys listed infrastructure assets which have an economic sensitivity that suits active management.

“Investments have a link to GDP or have pricing mechanisms that link revenues to inflation, providing inflation protection through the cycle,” he told delegates.

Commenting on President Biden’s plans for sweeping infrastructure investment, he said that unlike previous administration pledges, this fiscal stimulus could benefit listed infrastructure. He said Biden’s plans are different and could have important investor consequences around, for example, tax cuts and renewables. Extending tax credits for solar and wind makes these projects more profitable, he said. Elsewhere, driving 5G development will enable greater penetration for tower companies, and putting trillions into the economy is a good thing for economically sensitive businesses like freight railway.

Windfall opportunity

Investors can find infrastructure opportunities in long-term, fixed rate, secured assets and pick up a yield premium over corporate bonds, said fellow panellist Dominic Swan, global CIO of private debt at HSBC Asset Management. Higher yields can be found in non-investment grade allocations, however he cautioned that this shouldn’t be viewed as a long-term strategy.

Sponsored Content

“You don’t want to sign up to a 25-year exposure to a high yield asset,” he said. Swan also noted that while inflation doesn’t increase cash flows it pushes up an asset’s market value so that in periods of high inflation, infrastructure credit risk falls. He added that this is priced into how debt products are valued in the market, providing a windfall opportunity.

Infrastructure in, fixed income out

HSBC’s Swan also noted trends among investors substituting fixed income with infrastructure debt.

“We find people selling government bonds and replacing the allocation with investment grade infrastructure,” he said, noting a pick-up of 70-100 basis points in the investment grade space.

But investing in infrastructure in the current climate holds challenges. At Canada’s Alberta Investment Management Corporation, Ben Hawkins, senior vice president, infrastructure, said investor demand for infrastructure as a substitute for fixed income has pushed up demand but there is not much new supply.

His areas of focus include renewables, telecoms and digital infrastructure given new trends in remote working. That said, not all opportunities fit within a traditional infrastructure mandate, and he warned that this means risks and uncertainties preside.

Other trends include data increasingly helping resolve intermittency challenges in renewables and the reduced capacity issues currently faced by utilities.

“We are looking at the digital sphere to optimise delivery of services,” he said, referencing the need to future proof traditional assets.

Technological disruption

This led the conversation to the danger of infrastructure assets becoming obsolete in the new green economy. The number of stranded assets could spike in traditional energy infrastructure as well as assets subject to technological change, said Hawkins.

However, he argued that traditional gas pipeline infrastructure is less likely to be stranded in the transition. Gas will continue to be an important part of the fuel mix, he said.

Elsewhere technological disruption is growing in the satellite space. Over-the-top technologies provided by high-speed internet like Netflix on-demand are disrupting traditional services from cable and satellite providers.

“We need to be on top of this change,” he said.

However, he warned investors not to lose sight of traditional infrastructure characteristics in their quest to tap new trends. Predictable cashflows and downside protection remain central. Incremental investment dollars are going into new themes, but we are not going to start investing in new businesses that don’t have infrastructure-like characteristics, he said.

At HSBC, strategy is centred on drilling down to the fundamentals, namely stability of cashflows. In this aspect, renewables and digital infrastructure differ with renewables often linked to quasi-guaranteed cashflows comprising long term contracts with lower volatility.

In contrast, digital assets are typically subject to huge change as the revolution continues. Hence the need to adopt a shorter time frame when investing in digital assets.

“Given that we are exposed to change, and change is not a friend of debt holders we expect to be paid for the risk of technological obsolescence,” he said.

In response to questions around competition for assets, Hawkins noted how investors were moving up the risk spectrum and said that renewables were increasingly priced to perfection.

Strategy at AIMCo has taken a platform approach whereby the investor bypasses the competition by acquiring operational assets with a particular focus on the skills of the team on the ground, leveraging their operational and sector specific knowledge for advantage. It amounts to a less crowded trade, he concluded.

Asset Owner:AIMCo

Leave a Comment

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

Portfolios built for the old world will be severely tested as emerging forces rewrite the rules of investing. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that geopolitical and macroeconomic upheaval, together with the disruption wrought by AI, should force asset owners to rethink the structure and composition of portfolios.

Sort content by

Aware Super mulls return to infra funds; builds AI-driven data edge

Aware Super is considering a return to infrastructure funds after years of favouring direct investments. The infrastructure allocation currently stands at $15 billion and the fund sees benefits to access a “broader set of offerings” and opportunity sets via fund commitments to GPs, its head of infrastructure Mark Hector says.

Treasurer Steiner on Oregon’s private equity future

Top1000funds.com editor Amanda White speaks to Oregon State Treasurer, Elizabeth Steiner, about the future role and expectations of private equity, how a maturing of the asset class puts pressure on returns, and the private/ public asset mix in the fund’s four-yearly asset allocation review which has just begun.

Why asset owners should not outsource innovation

Asset owners have traditionally counted on external asset managers to pursue bold innovations rather than stretching their limited internal resources to do so. But leading Stanford academic Ashby Monk has warned in a new paper that this long-standing model is distilling short-term thinking in pension management.

HOOPP: Light covenants in private credit are a growing source of concern

The boom in private credit has been accompanied by a spike in lighter covenants, reducing protection and guardrails for lenders says Jennifer Shum, senior managing director, structured and private credit at HOOPP, and warns of mounting risks in private credit.

West Yorkshire prepares to up the pressure on Shell and BP

A new approach to holding the major oil companies to account will see the West Yorkshire Pension Fund, together with a cohort of other UK and European pension funds, demand BP and Shell explain their business plans in a world of declining demand for fossil fuels.

NBIM quantifies the portfolio threat of economic fragmentation

An economically fragmented world, where different economic blocs refuse to collaborate, impose tariffs and restrict foreign investments, would have disastrous consequences on the $2.2 trillion portfolio of Norges Bank Investment Management. Its latest stress test offers a rare glimpse into the concrete portfolio impact of deglobalisation.

Previous