Canada to allow retail contribution to new SWF

Mark Carney

Canada has established its first national-level sovereign wealth fund with a seed of C$25 billion ($18.3 billion) to underwrite “nation-building” projects like ports, mines and energy infrastructure.

In an announcement on Monday, Prime Minister Mark Carney says the SWF, dubbed the Canada Strong Fund, will invest alongside domestic and international private investors to drive “economic transformation”. The announcement comes amidst a global push for sovereign wealth funds to involve themselves more deeply with nation-building activities, with Australia’s Future Fund recently having its mandate amended to require it to consider “national priorities” when making or managing investments.

The Canada Strong Fund will operate at arm’s length from the government as a Crown corporation – sharing the same status with CPP Investments – and be led by a chief executive and a “qualified independent” board of directors. The organisation will be overseen by the Minister of Finance and National Revenue.

The initial seed will be released by the government over the next three years, with the expectation that returns on investments will give the fund a boost in AUM over time. But there will also be a retail investment product which will allow “individual Canadian investors to participate in Canada’s growth and benefit from its financial returns”.

The latter is an unusual funding mechanism as sovereign wealth funds typically manage pools of state capital, derived from natural resources or foreign exchange reserves. Some SWFs also issue bonds to diversify their funding sources, such as Abu Dhabi’s ADQ and Malaysia’s Khazanah Nasional Berhad.

The government also flagged the possibility it would explore more diversified funding sources in the future. Canadian advocacy and research group Common Wealth suggested this could be from common assets such as natural resources rent, use-fees on public property and public-private partnership equity; value created in the economic system such as budget surpluses; or “market concentration fees” such as levies on anti-competitive practices.

Sponsored Content

A “Canada Strong Fund transition office” will also be established to engage with other market participants and regulators.

“Through the Canada Strong Fund, all Canadians will have the opportunity to share directly in these benefits. This is our country, this is your future, and we are building it together,” Carney said.

 Details are scant on how the pool of capital will be invested, and it is still unclear as to whether the fund will house an internal investment team or leverage external managers, what type of assets it will invest in and what its return targets will be. Details around mandate, governance and implementation plans will be bedded down in the coming months.

Canada is the latest in a slew of countries that have established SWFs or kicked off the process to do so in recent years. US President Donald Trump signed an executive order to establish a US SWF last February, though its specific shape remains unclear as the 90-day deadline to release a plan for the SWF came and went without further news.

President Donald Trump has loosely described the objective of the US SWF in the executive order as being for the “sole benefit of American citizens”. Stanford expert Ashby Monk believes that to mean it is likely to be a sovereign development fund – a type of SWF “that strategically pursues both commercial returns and specific domestic policy goals”, the research paper says.

Indonesia established its second SWF Danantara last February “to manage and optimise government investments and assets from state-owned enterprises”.

The Canada Strong Fund joins other state investment vehicles including Canada Infrastructure Bank, Export Development Canada and the Canada Growth Fund to underpin investments in essential projects. “Comprehensive mandate reviews” will be conducted to ensure clarity of roles in the federal financing system.

Leave a Comment

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

The twin forces rewriting the rules of investing

Portfolios built for the old world will be severely tested as emerging forces rewrite the rules of investing. The Fiduciary Investors Symposium heard that geopolitical and macroeconomic upheaval, together with the disruption wrought by AI, should force asset owners to rethink the structure and composition of portfolios.

Sort content by

How to nature proof portfolios

Natural capital holds more risk and opportunity than climate change, but where do investors start? Top1000funds.com takes a deep dive exploring the investors that are making inroads to nature-proofing their portfolios.

Behind AustralianSuper’s global expansion

London-based AustralianSuper deputy CIO Damian Moloney oversees the global expansion plans of Australia’s largest superannuation fund. While a global presence has clear benefits for the fund and its members, Moloney’s advice to others contemplating the same is to plan extensively and build early.

Denmark’s PFA: Passive with a caveat and why an AI reset lies ahead

Kasper Lorenzen, chief investment officer of Denmark's PFA explains why passive is no longer applicable to the complex equity strategies that do much more than follow an index. He also explains why he believes an AI reset lies around the corner.

CFA’s guide to the whole framework on net-zero

Climate risk has certain features that stretch the imaginations and toolkits of investors, meaning a new framework that includes systems thinking is necessary to branch out from the narrow measurement and management of risk predicated on modern portfolio theory, says Roger Urwin.

LPPI’s Richard Tomlinson: Reflections of a sceptic

An environment of increased macro volatility and geopolitical risk means investors should question assumptions, move towards more narrative-based scenario thinking and build resilience says Richard Tomlinson, chief investment officer of LPPI.

Investors position for climate alpha

At CalPERS the rationale for investing in the energy transition is as compelling as it was for technology investors in the early 1990s, but investors need to also be aware of the myriad of risks alongside the opportunities, making it ripe for active management.

Previous