America’s net zero opportunity

With a massive, nationwide effort the United States could reach net zero emissions of greenhouse gases by 2050 using existing technology and at costs aligned with historical spending on energy. Research from the High Meadows Environmental Institute plots a Blueprint for the next decade showing the key is overcoming execution challenges including the infrastructure deployment and the mobilisation of capital and labour.

Achieving net zero would involve an unprecedented infrastructure build over the next three decades and huge electricity generation to meet demand from electric vehicles and electric households making solar and wind energy the “linchpins” in the transition, said Chris Greig, Theodora D. ’78 & William H. Walton III ’74 senior research scientist in the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment at Princeton University.

Speaking at Sustainability in Practice, Greig said that positioning wind and solar installation would depend on social and demographic criteria, considering the lowest cost of production and cost of delivery. A huge build out of offshore wind, transmission infrastructure and solar farms would have far reaching implications for the landscape. Elsewhere, new infrastructure would include natural gas turbines critical for balancing intermittency in the grid.

Achieving net zero would also spur a new bioenergy industry, said Greig. This sector could produce energy for aviation and petrochemical industries.

He predicted a strong push back from the arable industry spurring a food versus fuels debate but reassured that only existing crops used for energy should go into the mix. Instead, bioenergy could come from new sources like municipal waste. Despite “all kinds of challenges” including bringing farmers on board and a lack of infrastructure, he said the opportunity was tremendous.

Elsewhere, hydrogen will become a key component to the transition. It could be used in chemical and steel production and Greig predicted enduring demand for liquid fuels. Carbon capture will be another vital pillar taking carbon from everything from cement plants (“we are going to need a lot of it,” he said) to biofuel plants and natural gas power stations.

Sponsored Content

He said the transition needed fossil fuel companies “to get good” at carbon capture and that without carbon capture and storage it would be impossible to get to net zero.

Noting that it is a difficult industry to develop, he said the oil and gas industry is uniquely positioned to build out the infrastructure needed like pipelines and storage capacity.

“It is like building the oil and gas industry over again – but in 30 years,” he said.

He said that the cost of new energy services could remain affordable, but that it also depended on the mobilisation of capital. Bringing assets to fruition takes decades, and depends on technical studies, feasibility and a successful build. He noted that fund managers tend to allocate to investors who own operating assets and seldom provide risk capital to build greenfield infrastructure. “The real challenge is mobilising at risk capital to construct the assets.”

The massive infrastructure build will require a huge workforce and shape new communities. “On the face of it is a great political story,” he said.

However, he said the surge in jobs and growth would not be homogenous or on a state-by-state basis. Some oil states would go through declines, underscoring the need for a Just Transition.

The conversation also touched on investor caution given potential changes in the US political landscape. “What is your level of conviction that this will actually happen; what level of confidence can investors have?” asked Alexandra West, chief strategy officer – investments at Cbus.

Greig countered that Republican (or Trump states) also prosper in a net zero pathway. The wind and solar industry would provide huge jobs and “bring the mid-west” along, he said.

The conversation also touched on how car companies will build electric cars no matter who is President – and how Republican governors will quickly solicit investment in new energy assets for tax revenue and jobs.

Leave a Comment

Sustainability and the need for practicality over ideology

Sustainability and the need for practicality over ideology

Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Affairs, Princeton University warned that the sustainability debate needs to become less ideological and more practical. He added that policy on a carbon price would do more to counter climate change than Biden’s huge infrastructure spend.

Sort content by

Team ESG fights back

An opinion piece from Robert Armstrong, Financial Times: “My piece about Tariq Fancy and the case against ESG generated a great deal of mail. At least half of it was positive, mostly in the “thanks for pointing out that the emperor has no clothes” vein. A small minority made ad hominem attacks, which is even more encouraging for a journalist than praise.”

Global Renewables Investment Return 7 Times Higher Than Fossil Fuels

Renewable power investment continues to outperform fossil fuel investment across the globe, according to the latest research. This provides a strong signal regarding the decline of fossil fuel investment.

Investing for Net Zero

Economies, businesses and investors around the globe are joining the UN Race to Zero and committing to net zero 2050 targets. It is estimated that reaching net zero 2050 will require around $1-2 trillion of investment every year.

Climate investing is more than just the next big thing

Two experts discuss the risks and opportunities of climate change for asset managers in this podcast episode released by Robeco.

Towards a long-term net zero climate investment strategy

Over recent years both Phoenix and ASI have worked together extensively on developing a roadmap to integrate ESG principles into the investment management strategies which underpin the management of their assets.

Why Electric Cars Can’t Come Fast Enough

The transition from the ICE age to the EV age over the coming decade will represent rapid change in most countries. But from an environmental perspective, the EV age isn’t coming fast enough.

Previous