Minimising currency exposure

Ron Liesching, chairman of Mountain Pacific Group, an investment firm that contributed to the development of the FTSE Wealth Preservation Unit, examines a new solution to managing currency risk.

Global investors struggle with one central issue, currency risk. Now there is a new solution: the FTSE Wealth Preservation Unit (WPU). The WPU is a diversified basket consisting of 13 components that are designed to preserve global value.

Primarily a basket that includes the seven most liquid developed currencies and the four BRIC currencies, the FTSE WPU also has a small weight in two commodities – oil and gold.

Components of FTSE WPU

Source: FTSE, weights as of February 17, 2012

The dollar and beyond

Sponsored Content

Investors hold most of their assets in developed countries; the investments are attractive, but the currency exposure is not. For example, global developed market equities have 50 per cent exposure to the US dollar and another 31 per cent exposure to the euro, yen and pound sterling.

This undiversified currency basket is the side effect of equity investment. The currency basket is unattractive because these countries have unsustainable deficits and are at risk of credit downgrades. US, Euro and UK interest rates are well below inflation and no investor would recommend this currency basket.

The solution is to hedge the currency exposure into a superior diversified basket. Many have proposed this. At its 2011 annual conference, UBS surveyed over 80 managers of central banks, sovereign wealth funds and multilaterals with total assets over $8 trillion. Over half the respondents predicted that the dollar would be replaced by a currency basket within the next 25 years.

The World Bank’s Robert Zoellick went further in a November 2010 Financial Times article in which he proposed a new monetary system based on the major global currencies – including the dollar, euro, yen, pound and renminbi – that also makes use of gold.

 

Preserving long-term wealth
The volatility of FTSE WPU measured against the US dollar is currently 6 per cent per annum and the FTSE WPU yield is near 2 per cent per annum.

Hedging into FTSE WPU does not disturb existing investments. A separate currency-hedging program replaces the concentrated currency risk with FTSE WPU exposure. The WPU is designed to be liquid, so hedging $1 billion would have little market impact.

When revenues are in one currency, the FTSE WPU is especially useful as Ghazi Abdul Jawad, an advisory board member for FTSE WPU and chairman of Altaira Middle East noted: “A fall in the US dollar hits both oil revenues and the value of US assets. So partly hedging assets into FTSE WPU sharply reduces the US dollar risk that investors in this region face.”

Ultra high net worth groups and monetary authorities understand there is no riskless currency. They want to preserve long-term wealth in global terms. Philip Coggan, Buttonwood columnist at the Economist, notes in his new book, “Paper Promises”, that “The massive debts accumulated over the last 40 years can’t be repaid in full, and they won’t be paid”.

This is already happening: US inflation is currently 3 per cent per annum. As the Treasury Bill rate is 5 basis points, nearly 3 per cent per annum is being lost in real wealth. Inflation is the best way for democracies to deal with excessive debt. But this is doubly bad for foreign investors. Foreign investors lose from internal devaluation caused by inflation and external devaluation caused by declining currency value. This is why investors want to hedge their paper currency risk and preserve their wealth in global terms. The components in FTSE WPU are weighted to minimise these two paper currency risks. The movement of a currency against FTSE WPU shows how the global value of that currency is evolving. That rate is published daily by FTSE.

On December 31, 2011, one WPU bought US$1.

 

 

Asset Owner:World Bank

Leave a Comment

Sort content by

The power of technology: forward looking risk tools

The finance industry is slow in its willingness to innovate around technology, and is behind other industries says Jessica Donohue executive vice president, chief innovation officer and head of advisory and information solutions at State Street. And the cost of that inability, or stubbornness, around technology innovation is not inconsequential. State Street recently released its

AustralianSuper contemplates foreign outposts

Australia’s largest superannuation fund, AustralianSuper, is considering whether it should have its own investment management and currency hedging teams based in Europe and America. Due to the mandatory nature of the system in Australia, the current rate of funds under management growth means assets are doubling every four to five years. Peter Curtis, head of

Stanford dumps coal: why divestment doesn’t work

The decision by the Stanford University endowment to divest from coal stocks might produce some positive PR, but from an investment perspective it’s only making them worse off, says Andrew Ang, professor of finance at Columbia University, who says the move prompts the bigger question of what the purpose of a university endowment actually is.

GPIF continues equities rampage

The giant Japanese pension fund, the Government Pension Investment Fund, continues its quest to move from bonds into equities and shift around 30 per cent of assets, or around $327 billion, out of domestic bonds and short term assets, appointing four new equities managers. The new asset allocation, approved in October last year, sees the

How to use smart beta

While smart beta is a much-talked about concept, implementation is slow. Part of the reluctance of investors is the risk of sustained underperformance, but that can be overcome by matching portfolio liquidity requirements with factor cycle duration. Amanda White speaks to Michael Hunstad, head of quantitative equity research, global equity management, at Northern Trust. Sustained

Liquidity premium escapes UK investors

  UK pension funds have not taking advantage of their comparative advantage as long-term investors and have not earned a positive long-run liquidity premium on their investments, according to a paper from the Cass Business School that examines UK pension funds’ monthly allocations to major asset classes over the period 1987-2012. The authors – David

Previous