Conexus Financial, publisher of Top1000funds.com, further cements its position as a global influencer with the appointment of Fiona Reynolds as chief executive.

For the past nine years Reynolds has been based in London as the chief executive of the Principles for Responsible Investment a UN-supported network of investors that she has grown to more than 4,000 signatories, representing $121 trillion in AUM and 180 staff around the world. During her tenure sustainable investment has become mainstream and the PRI has become one of the most important investment institutions in the world.

Conexus Financial already has a strong footprint in the global pension market particularly through its influential Fiduciary Investors Symposium and Top1000funds.com publication which focuses on leading the global investment industry to continuous improvement.  The appointment of Reynolds, a global influencer, will expand this.

Reynolds said she was attracted to Conexus as a purpose-driven organisation and platform for change and was passionate about contributing to solutions focused on the end member.

“How do we really build a financial system that works for the many not the few?” she said. “We need to think about the world into which people are going to retire, not just annual returns. People, profit and planet must go together. For me personally I’ve always worked in areas and with people I believe are mission driven and that is evident at Conexus Financial.”

Through Conexus’ global footprint it has pushed the industry to question whether status quo processes and behaviours to tackle risks and opportunities will be sufficient in the future, and actively campaigns for diversity, sustainability, transparency, innovation and better alignment of fees in the investment industry.

Reynolds’ achievements as chief executive of the PRI for the past nine years brings further kudos to these campaigns and a focus on better outcomes for members and the better allocation of capital.

In addition, as the Australian superannuation market further professionalises with new legislation and consolidation among funds, Reynolds will be able to bring her global view to the domestic landscape and hold superannuation funds and providers accountable for global best practices. Prior to joining the PRI, Reynolds spent seven years as chief executive of the Australian Institute of Superannuation Trustees where she played an active role advocating for superannuation policy changes for working Australians.

Founding CEO of Conexus Financial, Colin Tate AM, will become executive chair of the business focusing on expanding its global offerings and its domestic impact through The Conexus Institute.

“I am proud of what we have achieved at Conexus Financial so far and we have much growth in front of us,” he said. “I’m looking forward to working with Fiona and to building Conexus to become an even more influentialplatform for change.”

Reynolds also serves on the board of the UN Global Compact, the council of the International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC), the Global Advisory Council on Stranded Assets at Oxford University, the UN Business for Peace Steering Committee and the Steering Committee for Investors on Climate Change, Climate Action 100+ and the Finance Against Slavery and Trafficking global committee, the Advisory Board of the UK Green Finance Institute and the Advisory Board for Greening the Belt and Road – a UK/China Initiative.

Conexus Financial is the publisher of Top1000funds.com, Investment Magazine and Professional Planner, and host of more than 20 annual events in the global and Australian institutional and wholesale markets.

Reynolds will take up her position as CEO of Conexus Financial in February 2022.

 

The COVID disruption to work has made investment industry leaders and employees think more carefully about what work might look like going forward.  The consequences of the forced experiment of remote work, the lessons learned along the way from the changes in work patterns and practices, and the social changes in worker attitudes and expectations have set the stage for a new model of working. Leaders must develop a deeper understanding of the dimensions and implications of hybrid work to sustain their firm’s edge in a world of accelerating workplace change.

The latest CFA Institute Future of Finance report, Future of Work in Investment Management, is an in-depth study examining how these trends will develop in the investment industry, using input from 4,600 investment professionals globally and leaders at investment organizations representing more than 230,000 employees.

We explored the changes investment organizations and investment professionals are likely to make as they reassess the context of careers, the content of work, and the culture of organizations, both in the near term and in the next five to 10 years.

The following is a list of key lessons for leaders, particularly related to the shift to hybrid working (generally meaning a mix of remote and in-person work), as well as the desire for more flexible working (meaning adjustable working hours).

  1. Know your people. Many organizations are assessing their employees’ interest in a hybrid working model, and 81 per cent of investment professionals we surveyed said they would like to work remotely part of the time. Among women, the level was 87 per cent, compared with 80 per cent of men.  Attitudes vary somewhat across geography and years of experience. Those with less than two years of experience in the industry were least likely to want to work remotely since it is more difficult to learn from others in a remote or hybrid environment, especially without the benefit of a robust professional network. Interest in hybrid work was highest in France (93 per cent) and lowest in China (45 per cent).
  2. Assess the effectiveness of your organization’s remote work experience. Among those we surveyed, 53 per cent said remote working increased their efficiency, and investment professionals across all roles now believe they can do a greater percentage of their job from home, supported by the experiences of the past year.  Even roles that were previously thought to be largely incompatible with remote work – such as chief investment officers, chief financial officers, and even traders – have proven to be adaptable and resilient to the remote work experiment.
  3. Consider the suitability of roles for hybrid or flexible arrangements. We found that the structure of investment professionals’ work seems to support a hybrid model. Most roles have a balance of uninterrupted time needed and time when teamwork is required. Chief executives and chief investment officers need the most teamwork. Credit and research analysts and economists are among those who need the most uninterrupted time. The least predictable jobs are analysts, economists, consultants, and CEOs, and are the types of roles that might be expected to be always accessible even in a flexible working environment.
  4. Provide managers with training on how to lead in a hybrid environment. Although a majority of investment professionals said they were more efficient when working remotely, only a third of managers thought those who worked for them had increased efficiency. Our research shows that having good leaders has always been important to retain people, but now it is also a primary motivator. Leaders’ responses—whether good or bad—to the stresses of the pandemic in their employees’ lives will have lasting effects on relationships and employee engagement. Among investment professionals we surveyed, 58 per cent are confident in the ability of leaders to manage teams in a hybrid work environment. Inclusivity in hybrid team settings and empathetic cultures will be key.
  1. Adapt client management approaches. Client-facing roles were least likely to report effectiveness gains from remote work, and there is a need to adapt communication practices and refine skills to establish new trust models with clients.  Expectations are that business travel will be permanently reduced by 25-50 per cent, and while video calls have replaced some travel, firms must think strategically about how to maintain trusted client relationships. Travel will be most needed when strategic decisions are to be made and at the start of a relationship or at major transition points. Client communication options will grow in complexity, and with this will come opportunities for firms to differentiate themselves.
  1. Learn from others. Most organizations we surveyed indicated that their policies will be changing to be more supportive of remote and flexible working as they recognize the feasibility and desirability of such policies for attracting and retaining talent. What had been case-by-case exceptions to the rule will become accepted practice by three-quarters of organizations. 
  1. Beware of the inclusion pitfalls. An all-remote environment evened the playing field in many ways, particularly in situations where meetings would have consisted of a full meeting room in the headquarters and a few people in satellite offices on the phone who were rarely acknowledged. This was not a positive for all employees however, and as different personal situations pulled some into constant multi-tasking, a two-tiered system emerged between those with the freedom to be on camera without interruptions and those whose audio-only presence limited their ability to engage. A hybrid approach will be more difficult to manage in terms of being inclusive, but this must be prioritized by leaders to create the right conditions for effective and engaging teamwork. 
  1. Remember your ESG promises. As investment organizations seek to demonstrate their alignment with ESG principles, investors are likely to note what workforce policy changes are made to support flexible work arrangements. This is a signal of the importance of managing their workforce well and considering employees as key stakeholders.
  1. Counter burnout with purpose. During the heights of the COVID pandemic, burnout became widespread, and the number of those working more than 60 hours per week nearly doubled, from 8 to 15 per cent. This was true across regions and gender and was especially prevalent among those with less than 10 years of work experience. Meanwhile, the pandemic has prompted more attention to positive organizational purpose, and there is a greater focus on outcomes that are bold and inspiring and that support belonging and motivation. While short-term business results are always in view, it is the longer-term vision that creates and sustains purpose. 
  1. Re-imagine your organizational culture. Organizations should take this opportunity to better understand the core elements of what makes their culture work and ensure they can adapt without harming their organizational identity. Learning to work in a hybrid work environment will take time, and it will likely be an iterative process for organizations. It will be worth the effort since it can be a differentiator in terms of attracting and retaining top talent.

The where, what, and how of work are undergoing simultaneous transformations, and this will be a defining leadership challenge and opportunity in the coming years.  With attention and intention, the industry can emerge stronger as a result.

Additional reports in this series will be published though 2021.

New research by Norges Bank, which manages the assets of the $1.39 trillion Norwegian sovereign wealth fund, examines how the increased focus on ESG issue can affect asset prices.

It looks at two modelling frameworks to explore how the the increased focus on ESG issues can affect asset prices, showing that when investors incorporate ESG into their portfolios as a non-financial considerations this leads to lower expected returns on higher ESG-scoring “green” assets and higher expected returns on “brown” assets.

It also shows that as more ESG-motivated investors are in the market, increased flows in to green assets can lead to outperformance.

Important the research by Norges, which owns 1.5 per cent of all the world’s stock, also considers how asset prices are affected when ESG measures reflect risks to assets’ expected cash flows. It looks at how the pricing of assets reflects how their payoffs relate to the state of the economy in different climate scenarios.

 

To read the research on asset pricing implications of the increasing consideration of ESG issues in investing click here.

 

 

Global Strategist Michael Power shares his latest thoughts on the most powerful currents affecting today’s markets.

Hear the Power perspective on questions like:

  • Is inflation back?
  • Are Western bond markets fatally compromised?
  • Is US GDP growth a healthy form of growth?
  • What on earth is China up to?
  • Regarding climate, is the world doing too little, too late?

Disclosures and important information

General risks. The value of investments, and any income generated from them, can fall as well as rise. Where charges are taken from capital, this may constrain future growth. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results. If any currency differs from the investor’s home currency, returns may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. Investment objectives and performance targets are subject to change and may not necessarily be achieved, losses may be made.

Specific risks

Currency exchange: Changes in the relative values of different currencies may adversely affect the value of investments and any related income. Emerging market (inc. China): These markets carry a higher risk of financial loss than more developed markets as they may have less developed legal, political, economic or other systems.

General Risks

All investments carry the risk of capital loss. The value of investments, and any income generated from them, can fall as well as rise and will be affected by changes in interest rates, currency fluctuations, general market conditions and other political, social and economic developments, as well as by specific matters relating to the assets in which the investment strategy invests. If any currency differs from the investor’s home currency, returns may increase or decrease as a result of currency fluctuations. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future results.

No representation is being made that any investment will or is likely to achieve profits or losses similar to those achieved in the past, or that significant losses will be avoided.

This is not a buy, sell or hold recommendation for any particular security. For further information on specific portfolio names, please see the Important information section.

 

———————————————————————————————————————–

 

All investments carry the risk of capital loss.

Important Information

This communication is provided for general information only should not be construed as advice.

All the information in is believed to be reliable but may be inaccurate or incomplete. The views are those of the contributor at the time of publication and do not necessary reflect those of Ninety One.

Any opinions stated are honestly held but are not guaranteed and should not be relied upon.

All rights reserved. Issued by Ninety One.

The past year has seen Cbus Super bolster its team and systems, adding to its internalisation of investments and continuing down the journey of fee reduction to deliver the best return of the fund’s 37-year history. Amanda White spoke to CIO Kristian Fok.

Cbus Super, the A$59 billion Australian industry fund delivered an annual return of 19.34 per cent for its growth option, the largest return in the fund’s 37-year history.

A willingness to be exposed to equities and a slight overweight position was the main contributor to the return with an additional alpha of 1 per cent added to the total portfolio from the equities’ allocation.

Equities make up about 50 per cent of the portfolio with the inhouse team managing about a third of that. The 4 per cent overweight allocation was in part deliberate but also a result of unfulfilled unlisted allocations being parked in equities.

“Last year we had strong alpha on global equities and Australian equities was flat, this year it was reversed and the Australian allocation was a really strong performer,” says Kristian Fok, the fund’s chief investment officer. “It’s about building robust portfolios that can make contributions at different times. The key thing is when things rotated we didn’t shift allocations we remained balanced and maintained our allocations so we didn’t lose performance.”

The Australian equities allocation is biased towards stockpicking with small and mid-cap allocations managed by a combination of the inhouse team and external managers.

In addition Fok says the fund’s unique position in unlisted property was a great contributor to its return. The fund’s property allocation returned 11.3 per cent compared with low to mid-single digits of the general property manager cohort.

“A big chunk was in Cbus Property and developments that were completed during that period, so the development profit was realised,” he says. “Leveraging off the insights from being closer to the sector helped.”

Cbus is underweight fixed income but has a significant overweight in cash, with about $5 billion waiting to be deployed. Fok says the fund is looking at boosting allocations to property and infrastructure, where it is already quite active, but also in credit.

“We are still quite active in the unlisted space, we’d like to do more there but it is probably going to be harder to put that money away and is becoming more challenging from a pricing point of view. We have the advantage of being able to develop property,” he says. “To be honest it is a once in a decade opportunity when markets correct like they did. The hardest thing is managing the liquidity aspect of it rather than the opportunity.”

Internalisation

Cbus currently manages 36 per cent of its assets internally, with the expectation that will rise to about 40 per cent. All the strategies are benchmarked against external equivalents.

Some of the strategies measured as ‘internal’ use the internal team for idea generation and external managers for execution, and Fok is open to new strategies and ideas.

“Within the 36 per cent internal there are some strategies where we partner with managers, particularly on the quant side. We design the strategy and they implement. It is very economical and allows us to think about ideas and opportunities and express them through our own IP and research.”

During Fok’s almost nine-year tenure as CIO, the investment team has grown from around 10 to now 115 with a further 20 positions to be filled across equities, responsible investment and operations.

Despite the internalisation Fok says the allocation to managers has actually increased. “65 per cent of the assets are still external and the assets have doubled.”

And like other asset owners Cbus has reduced the number of relationships, looking to managers to get insights that can benefit their decision making. An example is the insights on the built environment from the private equity investment with Brookfield Technology Partners.

“As an investor in that fund and co-investor in some of the companies we have the benefit of being an investor but also how that technology might be incorporated in the assets we own and we can introduce those insights to our managers so they can benefit,” he says.

“When we are adding sophistication and complexity we need the right data to understand the risks we are taking”

Fee reductions

In the past five years Cbus has reduced its asset management fees per dollar invested by 40 per cent.

In the past year alone investment costs, including transaction costs, have reduced by five basis points to 51 basis points.

“Internalisation has been a big contributor but also we look at fees with a holistic view and discipline,” Fok says. “Even this year there has been a lot of focus in talking to managers around what their fees are and how we can be more innovative around how we do things to keep good alignment and leverage scale.”

Cbus has been deliberate in passing on savings to members as it becomes bigger, with the reduction in fees coinciding with an increase in AUM of 20 per cent.

“You can get huge leverage with internal management, you can have the same people managing 20 per cent extra in assets with no extra cost,” he says.

Total portfolio management

Fok believes investors will have to work harder for the opportunities going forward and is looking to combine the top-down asset allocation function with ideas from the bottom up.

Mark Ferguson recently joined the team as head of total portfolio management overseeing three key aspects of the portfolio. The first is portfolio development which includes traditional asset allocation, and tilts across different time horizons, as well as thematics and longer term trends. He’ll also look after portfolio implementation including securities lending, options strategies and more sophisticated strategies to become a provider of liquidity.

“As you grow larger there needs to more sophisticated ways to express your market views and that will be uplifted. For example Mark has managed currency strategies and we will look to do more trading inhouse,” Fok says. “We will continue to increase the breadth of that and the opportunities. The challenge around low interest rates means fixed income is not as defensive as you think and having more tools will be really important.”

And the third area is the fund’s quantitative capabilities. This includes managing money quantitatively but also providing insights from those strategies to the broader team.

“That also provides the automation and insights to help the team gather broader information to make better decisions. They will continue to work with the direct investing teams and see that the information flows through into the valuations of that team.”

Cbus has a program of work around bringing in key data and using that to help automate some of its processes. One example is the use of the Matrix Investment Data Management system that provides a clearer look through of the true nature of exposures and the indirect fees.

“When we are adding sophistication and complexity we need the right data to understand the risks we are taking,” Fok says.

The fund is also looking to restructure the way its custodian pulls together the different investment accounts so the fund can create options in a building block approach in a more granular way.

“It is important to be able to take control around rebalancing, and we need a system that can handle it, automate the information and seamlessly interface with the custodian. The technology aspect is incredibly important in allowing us to be more granular in the way we look ag things, but also so we can scale.”

As the fund looks to more mergers, a hallmark of the Australian superannuation landscape, it is expanding its investment options to encapsulate the full market offering.

The fund recently merged with Media Super, and while Fok says he can’t talk on the record about any future mergers he says the fund is in “constant dialogue” is of the firm belief that scale matters and mergers are good for its members.

 

 

As more and more investors make net zero commitments in the lead up to COP26, sustainability is at the forefront of investors’ minds. But what does it mean to invest sustainably?

There is a plethora of events that tout the value of sustainable investments, but very few that interrogate the subject in the way that allows institutional investors to overcome the challenges of implementation.

The Top1000funds.com Sustainability in Practice event, to be held online on September 8 and 9, will do just that.

It will bring together asset owners, managers and academics for a practical take on sustainable investment. In order to implement the sustainability goals that asset owners have set as strategic initiatives they will need board and C-suite buy-in and directive. This conference is specifically aimed at CIOs and showcases practical case studies on how investors around the world are tackling these issues.

We will look at whether the metrics, measurements, returns and risks are adequately framed and understood; how investment leaders can navigate the politics of sustainability and prevent greenwashing from prevailing; examine the allocation strategies and investments that investors should be targeting and what the tangible implications for investors’ portfolios are; as well as the role asset owners have in allocating capital and how they overcome the obstacles they will face.

The event program has had the invaluable input from asset owners all around the world including AP4, OPTrust, OTPP, USS, PGGM and UPP.  Some of the speakers are highlighted below and you can click here to register or receive more information.

  • Jeb Burns, chief investment officer, MERS of Michigan
  • Evan Cairns, head of climate change strategy, Aberdeen
  • Niklas Ekvall, chief executive, AP4
  • Chris Greig, Theodora D. ’78 & William H. Walton III ’74 Senior Research Scientist in the Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment at Princeton University
  • Janine Guilott, chief executive, The Value Reporting Foundation
  • Zsolt Kohalmi, global head of real estate, Pictet
  • Stephen Kotkin, Professor in History and International Relations, Princeton University
  • Bill Lee, chief investment officer, New York Presbyterian
  • Jie Lu, head of investments, China, Robeco
  • Innes McKeand, head of strategic equities, USS Investment Management
  • Dr Arun Majumdar, Professor of Mechanical Engineering and Photon Science, Stanford Energy
  • David Neal, chief executive, IFM
  • Carsten Stendevad, co-chief investment officer for sustainability, Bridgewater
  • Jaap van Dam, director of strategy, PGGM

The event is open to asset owners and consultants only.